BHOOPRAM SHARMA,PANCHKULA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD NO.1, PANCHKULA
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 860/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 Apr 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)
For Appellant: Shri Rishab Gupta, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT
Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 270ASection 271ASection 272A(1)(d)Section 69A
272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with statutory notices. The total assessed income was computed as Rs. 79,32,230/-, comprising the declared income of Rs. 2,86,490/-, the unexplained cash deposits of Rs. 58,97,020/-, and the additional turnover-based income of Rs. 17,48,720/-. The AO issued the assessment order along with a demand notice
