BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 272A(1)(c)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune210Delhi153Chennai76Bangalore43Visakhapatnam37Mumbai36Cochin27Surat22Karnataka21Nagpur18Lucknow15Kolkata10Panaji10Ahmedabad9Hyderabad8Cuttack8Jaipur4Chandigarh3Patna3Raipur3Rajkot3SC2Indore2Jodhpur1Amritsar1Varanasi1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 1314Section 272A(2)(k)3Penalty3Limitation/Time-bar3Section 272A(1)(c)2Section 143(3)2Section 272A2Condonation of Delay2

SH. LAL CHAND,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT, C-2(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are allowed for 7

ITA 1107/CHANDI/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh05 Mar 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit AggarwalFor Respondent: Smt. Chandrakanta
Section 131Section 143(3)Section 272ASection 272A(1)(c)

delay which deserved to be condoned. 3. That on the facts, circumstances and legal position of the case, the Worthy CIT(A) was unjustified in confirming the action of the Ld. Assessing Officer wherein he has erred in levying the impugned penalty of Rs. 10,000/- under section 272A(1)(c

SH. LAL CHAND,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT, C-2(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are allowed for 7

ITA 1108/CHANDI/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh05 Mar 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit AggarwalFor Respondent: Smt. Chandrakanta
Section 131Section 143(3)Section 272ASection 272A(1)(c)

delay which deserved to be condoned. 3. That on the facts, circumstances and legal position of the case, the Worthy CIT(A) was unjustified in confirming the action of the Ld. Assessing Officer wherein he has erred in levying the impugned penalty of Rs. 10,000/- under section 272A(1)(c

M/S BNK INVESTMENTS,CHANDIGARH vs. JCIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1385/CHANDI/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh04 Apr 2019AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Tej Mohan SinghFor Respondent: Shri Yogender Mittal,Sr.DR
Section 206ASection 272A(2)(k)

C, Chandigarh. बनाम Chandigarh. "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: PTLHI2106D अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Tej Mohan Singh राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Yogender Mittal,Sr.DR सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing : 28.03.2019 उदघोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 04.04.2019 आदेश/Order PER ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER