Search: condonation of delay

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 271Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Raipur38 Delhi28 Cochin24 Jaipur22 Karnataka21 Ahmedabad15 Nagpur8 Bangalore6 Mumbai5 Chandigarh5 Visakhapatnam3 Chennai3 Lucknow2 Kolkata2 Surat2 Panaji1 SC1 Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 271C13 Section 2068 Penalty5 TDS5 Section 133A4 Section 206C4 Addition to Income4 Survey u/s 133A4

ASSISTANT CONTROLLER F&A DIRECTORATE OF INDUSTRIES,SHIMLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), WARD SHIMLA

ITA 98/CHANDI/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh09 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A) came to be dismissed without adjudication on merits, primarily on the ground that there was delay in filing of the appeal and that the assessee failed to respond to the notices issued by the Ld. CIT(A).

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Mohan, Sr. Advocate with Shri Abhinav Bijwaria, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR

Section 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

condoning of the delay is bad in law and facts. 3. Briefly stated, the facts are that the assessee is a nodal agency of the Government of Himachal Pradesh. Penalty under section 271C

ASSISTANT CONTROLLER F&A DIRECTORATE OF INDUSTRIES,SHIMLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), WARD SHIMLA

THE ASSISTANT EXCISE & TAXATION COMMISSIONER ,NAHAN vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE, SHIMLA

ASSISTANT CONTROLLER F&A DIRECTORATE OF INDUSTRIES,SHIMLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), WARD SHIMLA

THE ASSISTANT EXCISE & TAXATION COMMISSIONER ,NAHAN vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE, SHIMLA

THE ASSISTANT EXCISE & TAXATION COMMISSIONER ,NAHAN vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE, SHIMLA

THE ASSISTANT EXCISE & TAXATION COMMISSIONER ,SHIMLA vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE, SHIMLA

THE ASSISTANT EXCISE & TAXATION COMMISSIONER ,SHIMLA vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE, SHIMLA