Search: condonation of delay

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 26Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai15 Mumbai14 Jaipur13 Indore13 Kolkata7 Surat6 Bangalore5 Cochin5 Varanasi3 Hyderabad3 Raipur3 Pune2 Chandigarh2 Nagpur2 Cuttack2 Delhi2 Amritsar1 Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 402 Section 14A2 Disallowance2 Limitation/Time-bar2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH vs. ESSIX BIOSCIENCES LIMITED, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal filed by the Department is

ITA 534/CHANDI/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh12 Apr 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI A.D.JAIN (Vice President), SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Ved Jain, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT-DR

Section 14ASection 201Section 40

delay is condoned. 4. The Department in its appeal in ITA No.534/CHD/2023 has raised the following grounds : (i) The Ld, CTT(A), on facts and circumstances of j the ease, has erred in deleting the disallowance made of Rs. 1,86,96,356/- u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act by the AO holding that the assessee has failed

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH vs. ESSIX BIOSCIENCES LIMITED, CHANDIGARH

M/S APEX BUILDERS, LUDHIANA vs. ITO, W-2(1), LUDHIANA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH vs. ESSIX BIOSCIENCES LIMITED, CHANDIGARH

M/S APEX BUILDERS, LUDHIANA vs. ITO, W-2(1), LUDHIANA