Search: condonation of delay

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 269Tclear

Sorted by relevance

Pune24 Hyderabad11 Mumbai9 Kolkata9 Ahmedabad9 Visakhapatnam9 Delhi7 Cochin6 Chennai4 Lucknow4 Rajkot4 Chandigarh3 Surat3 Bangalore3 Indore2 Amritsar2 Jaipur2 Nagpur1 Agra1

Key Topics

Section 269S10 Section 271E6 Section 271D4 Section 269T3 Penalty3 Section 249(2)2 Section 249(3)2 Addition to Income2 Limitation/Time-bar

NARINDER PAL KAUR,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, KHANNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1138/CHANDI/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh14 May 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.A and Ms. Shruti Khandelwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjit Kaur, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR

Section 249(2)Section 249(3)Section 269TSection 271E

269T, involving cash repayment of loan/deposit to one S. Kamal Singh. The penalty order was passed on 21.02.2022. 5. The assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) on 31.05.2022, which was delayed by 70 days beyond the statutory period prescribed under section 249(2). The explanation given for the delay was the assessee’s prolonged health issues

NARINDER PAL KAUR,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, KHANNA

NARINDER PAL KAUR,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, KHANNA

NARINDER PAL KAUR,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, KHANNA

SURJIT KAUR ,PUNJAB vs. ITO WARD 3 , KHANNA, PUNJAB