BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 234Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai52Hyderabad31Bangalore30Delhi26Ahmedabad22Jaipur16Kolkata7Surat7Indore6Chennai5Chandigarh5Nagpur5Pune4Rajkot4Jabalpur2Raipur1Varanasi1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 1473Penalty3Section 234B2Section 1482Section 143(3)2

M/S GYMKHANA CLUB,PANCHKULA vs. ITO, W-3, PANCHKULA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1305/CHANDI/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh28 Oct 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A.D.Jain, Vice Prersident & Shri Vikram Singh Yadavआयकर अपील सं./Ita No 1305/Chd/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S Gymkhana Club, Vs The Ito, Sector 6, Ward-3, Panchkula. Panchkula. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aaaag0115B अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent िनधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By: Shri S.K.Mukhi, Advocate राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue By : Shri Vivek Vardhan, Jcit, Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 07.10.2024 उदघोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/10/2024 Physical Hearing आदेश/Order Per Vikram Singh Yadav,A.M.

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Mukhi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr.DR
Section 234B

delay is herby condoned and the appeal of the assessee is admitted for adjudication. 3. Briefly the facts of the case are that the assessee club had declared ‘Nil’ income in its return of income claiming the whole of its receipts as exempt under the principle of mutuality. As per the return of income filed for the year under consideration

IPF VIKRAM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE, PANCHKULA, PANCHKULA

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1204/CHANDI/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Tejmohan Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 148

delay of 42 days in filing the appeal is condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication on merits. 2 5. In the present appeal Assessee has raised the following grounds: 1. That the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in law in upholding the reopening the assessment by issuance of notice

SH. ASHISH CHAUDHRY,LUDHIANA vs. ITO, W-1(1), LUDHIANA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are dismissed

ITA 1153/CHANDI/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh06 Dec 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: None (Application for withdrawal of Power of Attorney)For Respondent: Smt. Amanpreet Kaur, Sr. DR
Section 147

condonation of delay in filing appeal on account of technical glitches of income tax portal being in infancy stages of new e-filing procedure for filing appeals before Commissioner(Appeals. 6. That the interest u/s 234A, 234B, 234C and 234D have been wrongly and illegally charged. 7. That the Appellant craves permission to add, amend, elucidate any ground of appeal

SH. AMIT CHAUDHRY,LUDHIANA vs. ITO, W-1(1), LUDHIANA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are dismissed

ITA 1157/CHANDI/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh06 Dec 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: None (Application for withdrawal of Power of Attorney)For Respondent: Smt. Amanpreet Kaur, Sr. DR
Section 147

condonation of delay in filing appeal on account of technical glitches of income tax portal being in infancy stages of new e-filing procedure for filing appeals before Commissioner(Appeals. 6. That the interest u/s 234A, 234B, 234C and 234D have been wrongly and illegally charged. 7. That the Appellant craves permission to add, amend, elucidate any ground of appeal

SH. SURESH CHAUDHRY,LUDHIANA vs. ITO, W-1(3), LUDHIANA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are dismissed

ITA 1155/CHANDI/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh06 Dec 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: None (Application for withdrawal of Power of Attorney)For Respondent: Smt. Amanpreet Kaur, Sr. DR
Section 147

condonation of delay in filing appeal on account of technical glitches of income tax portal being in infancy stages of new e-filing procedure for filing appeals before Commissioner(Appeals. 6. That the interest u/s 234A, 234B, 234C and 234D have been wrongly and illegally charged. 7. That the Appellant craves permission to add, amend, elucidate any ground of appeal