BALDEV SINGH,FATEHABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARDS 1, FATEHBAD
In the result, appeal is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 813/CHANDI/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh17 Jan 2025AY 2012-13
Bench: Shri Rajpal Yaday & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 813/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 Baldev Singh, Vs. The Ito, बनाम M/S Baldev Singh Jarnail Ward-1, Singh, Anaj Mandi, Fatehabad Dharsul Kalan, Tehsil Tohana, Fatehabad
For Appellant: Sh. Nikhil Goyal, Advocate and Shri Ashok Goyal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 148Section 249Section 250Section 253Section 3Section 5
condone the delay and proceed to decide the appeals on merits.
8. The Assessee has taken five grounds of appeal out of which Ground No. 5 is a general which does not call for recording of any specific findings.
9. In Ground No.3, Assessee has pleaded that the ld. Assessing
Officer has erred in charging the tax u/s 115BBE
