Search: condonation of delay

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 230clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 115B8 Section 143(1)7 Section 1444 Section 683 Section 69A2 Section 2532 Business Income2 Search & Seizure2 Cash Deposit

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , LUDHIANA vs. KAPIL ROMANA , BATHINDA

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue as well as Cross Objections of the Assessee are dismissed

ITA 773/CHANDI/2023[2018]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh16 Jun 2025

Bench: SHRI. RAJPAL YADAV (Vice President), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

section 292C? 3. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 40,84,04,290/- made on account of unexplained unsecured loans u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE of the Income Tax Act, 1961? 4. That the Ld. CIT(A) has ignored the facts that the entry of Dr. Jagjeet Chawla on the said page was cross-referred

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, LUDHIANA vs. KAPIL ROMANA, BATHINDA

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue as well as Cross Objections of the Assessee are dismissed

ITA 926/CHANDI/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , LUDHIANA vs. KAPIL ROMANA , BATHINDA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, LUDHIANA vs. KAPIL ROMANA, BATHINDA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , LUDHIANA vs. KAPIL ROMANA , BATHINDA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, LUDHIANA vs. KAPIL ROMANA, BATHINDA

CEE ENN ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED BAREWAL SUKHMANI ENCLAVE LUDHIANA,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(5) LUDHIANA RISHI NAGAR LUDHIANA, INCOME TAX OFFICER LUDHIANA RISHI NAGAR LUDHINA

BHOOPRAM SHARMA,PANCHKULA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD NO.1, PANCHKULA

MS EKOM EXIM PRIVATE LIMITED, SCO-11, SECTOR-4D, BATTAN LAL ROAD, GT ROAD, MANDI GOBINDGARH,FATEHGARH SAHIB vs. THE JURISDICTIONAL OFFICER ACIT,DCIT CENTRE CIRCLE PATIALA, PUNJAB