Search: condonation of delay

1 result for “condonation of delay”+ Section 194Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Kolkata32 Mumbai29 Chennai24 Delhi23 Hyderabad5 Bangalore4 Patna4 Lucknow3 Visakhapatnam2 Indore2 Jaipur2 Rajkot2 Surat2 Varanasi2 Ahmedabad2 Amritsar1 Raipur1 Karnataka1 Jabalpur1 Cochin1 Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 194H4 Section 201(1)2 Section 194J2 Section 194C2

JCIT(OSD)(TDS),CIRCLE, PANCHKULA vs. M/S LIBERTY SHOES LTD.,, KARNAL

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 268/CHANDI/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 Oct 2021AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri R.L Negiआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 268/Chd/2020 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years : 2017-18 Joint Commissioner Of Income M/S Liberty Shoes Ltd., बनाम 13Th Mile Stone, Tax (Osd) (Tds) Circle Aaykar Bhawan, Sector 2 Liberty Puram, G.T. Road, Panchkula Kutail, Karnal Tan No: Rtkl00664G अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Appellant: Sh. Satish Kumar Goel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Meenakshi Vohra, Addl. CIT

Section 133A(1)Section 144ASection 194CSection 194HSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)

condoned the delay and permitted the Ld. DR to argue the appeal on merits. 6. Accordingly, the Ld. departmental representative submitted that the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in holding that the assessee was not required to deduct tax at source in respect of incentive paid to various dealers as incentives. The Ld. DR further submitted that the assessee during