Search: condonation of delay

1 result for “condonation of delay”+ Section 194Hclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai23 Delhi16 Bangalore9 Jaipur8 Chennai7 Kolkata5 Hyderabad3 Allahabad3 Ahmedabad2 Indore2 Nagpur2 Patna2 Telangana1 Visakhapatnam1 Rajkot1 SC1 Surat1 Lucknow1 Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 194H4 Section 201(1)2 Section 194J2 Section 194C2

JCIT(OSD)(TDS),CIRCLE, PANCHKULA vs. M/S LIBERTY SHOES LTD.,, KARNAL

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 268/CHANDI/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 Oct 2021AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri R.L Negiआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 268/Chd/2020 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years : 2017-18 Joint Commissioner Of Income M/S Liberty Shoes Ltd., बनाम 13Th Mile Stone, Tax (Osd) (Tds) Circle Aaykar Bhawan, Sector 2 Liberty Puram, G.T. Road, Panchkula Kutail, Karnal Tan No: Rtkl00664G अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Appellant: Sh. Satish Kumar Goel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Meenakshi Vohra, Addl. CIT

Section 133A(1)Section 144ASection 194CSection 194HSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)

condoned the delay and permitted the Ld. DR to argue the appeal on merits. 6. Accordingly, the Ld. departmental representative submitted that the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in holding that the assessee was not required to deduct tax at source in respect of incentive paid to various dealers as incentives. The Ld. DR further submitted that the assessee during