BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 272clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka448Delhi40Mumbai34Bangalore18Pune17Jaipur16Amritsar16Calcutta16Cuttack14Chennai14Cochin12Lucknow11Ahmedabad8Jodhpur5Indore5Kolkata3Rajasthan3Chandigarh3Nagpur3Telangana3Visakhapatnam2Raipur1Rajkot1Andhra Pradesh1Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 106Section 11(2)3Section 143(3)2Exemption2Disallowance2Addition to Income2

THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS SOCIETY,LUDHIANA vs. ACIT, EXEMPTIONS, C-1, CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1412/CHANDI/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Jul 2021AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ashok Khanna, Addl. CIT
Section 11(2)Section 12ASection 17

272 (Mumbai-Trib) 16. In his rival submissions the Ld. DR strongly supported the orders of the authorities below and further submitted that the assessee did not furnish Form No. 10 electronically before filing of the return of income which is requirement under section 11(2) of the Act, therefore, the A.O. was fully justified in denying the claim

ITO, WARD (E), CHANDIGARH vs. SANT BABA SUNDER SINGH, BARNALA

In the result the appeal of the revenue is dismissed said order was pronounced in the open court at the time of hearing itself

ITA 1183/CHANDI/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh01 Mar 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Diva Singhassessment Year: 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri Manjit Singh, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Shri Rajit Saldi
Section 10Section 11Section 143(3)Section 68

charitable trust and that in the subsequent year the claim has been allowed by Hon'ble High Court. However, the appellant had not raised this ground before the Id. CIT(A) and the same ground was taken for the first time before the Hon'ble ITAT, Division Bench, Chandigarh. While adjudicating this ground the Hon'ble ITAT, Division Bench, Chandigarh

SH. DEVINDER KUMAR,LUDHIANA vs. ITO, W-VII(1), LUDHIANA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is, therefore,

ITA 1270/CHANDI/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 May 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptash.Devinder Kumar, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 14, Surya Vihar, Ward-Vii (1), Rishi Nagar, Ludhiana. Ludhiana. New Address: C/O M/S Shree Aum Hospital Aashiana Complex, Bari Brahmana, Jammu. (Jammu & Kashmir). Pan: Aenpk0344L (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Ms. Deepika Mohan, JCIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)(iii)

charitable trusts and therefore no interest was charged. Further opportunities were also given to the assessee wherein he contended that the loans raised were for business purpose only. The Assessing Officer after considering the reply filed by the assessee, held that the assessee had failed to establish the commercial expediency for making the said loans and also that the loans