CT EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,JALANDHAR vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 422/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh10 Dec 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)
For Appellant: Shri Ashray Sarna, CA(Virtual Mode)For Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR
Section 11Section 143Section 143(3)Section 144B
144B.
3.1
The AO concluded that the assessee was existing for profit and functioning on commercial principles, leading to the denial of the benefit of exemption under Section 11 of the Income-tax Act. The original surplus of Rs.
8,35,76,594.11/- was consequently taxed as an Association of Persons (AOP).
3.2
The key findings and resulting financial actions