CHANDIGARH EDUCATIONAL TRUST,MOHALI vs. PR.CIT-CENTRAL,GURGAON, AT CHANDIGARH

Charitable Trust Vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, (Centra), Lucknow [2018] 93 taxmann.com 483(All.) • Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Pune Vs. Sungard Solutions(I) (P.) Ltd. [2019] 105 taxmann.com 67 (Bom) 5.19 The Ld. Pr. CIT(Central),Gurugram was of the view that he shall exercise all the powers and perform all the functions as stipulated

DCIT, C-,1 (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB MEDICAL FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST, JALANDHAR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: S/Shri N.K. Saini, Vice- & Rajpal Yadav, Vice-"नधा"रण वष"/ Asstt.Year: 2014-15 Dcit, Cir.1(Exemption) M/S.Punjab Medical Foundation Chandigarh. Vs. Charitable Trust 63-64, Waryam Nagar Cool Road, Jalandhar Pan : Aaatp 5171 B (Applicant) (Responent) : Shri Sudhir Sehal, Advocate Assessee By Revenue By : Shri Ashok K. Khana, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 18/11/2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 21/12/2020 आदेश/O R D E R

trust.” 3. A perusal of the record along with the above grounds of appeal would indicate that though Revenue has taken four grounds of appeal but its grievance revolve around solitary issue, whether the assessee is to be treated as a “charitable institution” and entitled for benefit under sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for assessment

KANDI FRIENDS EDUCATIONAL TRUST,ROPAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSION OF INCOME TAX, CL. 1, EXEMPTION, CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahay

charitable objective, hence not entitled for benefit of Section 11 of the Act. 7. The appeal to the CIT (Appeals) did not bring any relief to the assessee on this part. 8. Before us, it was submitted by the ld. counsel for the assessee that since inception, these activities have never been doubted. There is no change in the activity

KANDI FRIENDS EDUCATIONAL TRUST,ROPAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahay

charitable objective, hence not entitled for benefit of Section 11 of the Act. 7. The appeal to the CIT (Appeals) did not bring any relief to the assessee on this part. 8. Before us, it was submitted by the ld. counsel for the assessee that since inception, these activities have never been doubted. There is no change in the activity

DCIT, C-1 (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH vs. THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS SOCIETY, LUDHIANA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

142(1)\nwere issued and served upon the assessee.\n5.2 The 1d. AO has analyzed the activities of the assessee\nand found that assessee has extended the undue benefit to\ntwo individuals, who fellwithin the ambit of individuals'\ncontained in sub-section (3) to Section 13. Hence, payments\ngiven to these two individuals namely, Kalpana Thakur and\nShubhdeep have been

HARYANA BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION WORKERS WELFARE BOARD,PANCHKULA vs. DCIT, EXEMPTION, CHANDIGARH

In the result, this appeal of the Assessee stands dismissed

charitable in nature, duly registered\nunder Section 12AA, and meet all conditions under Sections 11\nand 12 for exemption.\nForm 10s filed for AYs 2019-20 and 2020-21 were submitted\nshowing accumulation and break-up of funds under Section 11(2),\nalong with corresponding applications.\nThe surplus accumulated in AY 2016–17 was fully utilized by AY\n2021

HARYANA BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION WORKERS WELFARE BOARD,PANCHKULA vs. DCIT, EXEMPTION, SECTOR 17

In the result, this appeal of the Assessee stands dismissed

charitable in nature, duly registered\nunder Section 12AA, and meet all conditions under Sections 11\nand 12 for exemption.\n•\nForm 10s filed for AYs 2019-20 and 2020-21 were submitted\nshowing accumulation and break-up of funds under Section 11(2),\nalong with corresponding applications.\n•\nThe surplus accumulated in AY 2016–17 was fully utilized

HARYANA BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION WORKERS WELFARE BOARD,PANCHKULA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, this appeal of the Assessee stands dismissed

charitable in nature, duly registered\nunder Section 12AA, and meet all conditions under Sections 11\nand 12 for exemption.\n•\nForm 10s filed for AYs 2019-20 and 2020-21 were submitted\nshowing accumulation and break-up of funds under Section 11(2),\nalong with corresponding applications.\n•\nThe surplus accumulated in AY 2016–17 was fully utilized

HARYANA BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION WORKERS WELFARE BOARD,PANCHKULA vs. DCIT, EXEMPTION, CHANDIGARH

In the result, this appeal of the Assessee stands dismissed

charitable in nature, duly registered\nunder Section 12AA, and meet all conditions under Sections 11\nand 12 for exemption.\n\n•\nForm 10s filed for AYs 2019-20 and 2020-21 were submitted\nshowing accumulation and break-up of funds under Section 11(2),\nalong with corresponding applications.\n\n•\nThe surplus accumulated in AY 2016–17 was fully utilized

CT EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,JALANDHAR vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is Partly Allowed for\nStatistical Purposes as per the directions above

142(1) (as detailed in Para 3 and 5 of the Assessment Order). Specifically,\nthe AO noted the Assessee's failure to produce books of accounts or provide full\njustification for various transactions.\n3.1 Based on the material available on record, the AO denied the benefit of\nexemption under Sections 11 and 12, treating the Assessee as an Association

HIMALAYAN BUDDHIST CULTURAL ASSOCIATION,KULLU vs. ACIT,CIRCLE/DCIT CPC,BENGLURU, MANDI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Due Date Of Filling Of Income Tax Return Was On Bonafide Grounds, The Cit(A) Has Erred In Not Condoning The Delay.

Trust for charitable purposes and the same being duly deposited as per provisions of section 11(5) of the Act, the addition made is against the scope of section 11 and is un-sustainable under law. 3. That the orders of the lower authorities are not justified on facts and the same are bad in law. 4. That the assessee

SMT RAMANANDI ANANGPURIA CHARITABLE TRUST,TAGORE PUBLIC SCHOOL, PALWAL vs. DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE 2, CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL (Accountant Member)

Charitable Trust Circle-2, Chandigarh Akul Agarwal and Associates, Plot No. D2/20, Ground Floor, Sector 10, DLF, Faridabad-121006 "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABTR0448N अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Akul Agarwal, C.A (Virtual Mode) राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Smt. Tarundeep Kaur, CIT, DR (Virtual Mode) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date

M/S HERITAGE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH

142(1) of the Act along with questionnaire was issued on 19.6.2017. The assessee furnished various details and documents along with books of accounts and vouchers which were examined by the Assessing Officer on test check basis. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing ITA Nos 1069 to 1071-chd-2019- M/s Heritage Educational Society, Chandigarh Officer noticed that

M/S HERITAGE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH

142(1) of the Act along with questionnaire was issued on 19.6.2017. The assessee furnished various details and documents along with books of accounts and vouchers which were examined by the Assessing Officer on test check basis. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing ITA Nos 1069 to 1071-chd-2019- M/s Heritage Educational Society, Chandigarh Officer noticed that

M/S HERITAGE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH

142(1) of the Act along with questionnaire was issued on 19.6.2017. The assessee furnished various details and documents along with books of accounts and vouchers which were examined by the Assessing Officer on test check basis. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing ITA Nos 1069 to 1071-chd-2019- M/s Heritage Educational Society, Chandigarh Officer noticed that

JCIT(OSD), C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. THE SIKH EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, PATIALA

Bench: The Ld. Cit(A) Against Assessment Order Dt. 30/03/2013 Which Was Passed By Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala Range, Patiala, Punjab Which Order Is Hereinafter Referred To As “Ao’S Order”.

Charitable or religious Trust etc. 17B. The report of the audit of the accounts of Trust or institution which is required to be furnished under clause (b) of Section 12A shall be in Form No. 10B. The assessee has furnished in the Income-tax Return in the ITR-7 on 15-10-2010. The assessee has not enclosed the audit

THE SIKH EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,PATIALA vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE, PATIALA

Bench: The Ld. Cit(A) Against Assessment Order Dt. 30/03/2013 Which Was Passed By Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala Range, Patiala, Punjab Which Order Is Hereinafter Referred To As “Ao’S Order”.

Charitable or religious Trust etc. 17B. The report of the audit of the accounts of Trust or institution which is required to be furnished under clause (b) of Section 12A shall be in Form No. 10B. The assessee has furnished in the Income-tax Return in the ITR-7 on 15-10-2010. The assessee has not enclosed the audit

DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

section 13(1)(c) is to judge the reasonableness of the payments made to the members of the society and secondly and more importantly, there is no finding of the AO that the society is not working towards the objects of education etc. as defined in its Memorandum and Rules and Regulations. No case of siphoning off of the funds