RANJIT SINGH,PANCHKULA vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, CPC DEPARTMENT

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated by this Court

SH. AMARDEEP SINGH ATHWAL,YAMUNANAGAR vs. ITO, WARD-1, YAMUNANAGAR

Bench: BEFORE: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated by this Court

PAWAN KUMAR,FATEHABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, FATEHABAD

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated by this Court

SH. AMARDEEP SINGH ATHWAL,YAMUNANAGAR vs. ITO, WARD-1, YAMUNANAGAR

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated by this Court

BALBIR KUMAR HUF,CHANDIGARH vs. ITO , CHANDIGARH

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated by this Court

SMT. SHANKRI DEVI,PANCHKULA vs. ACIT, PANCKULA CIRCLE, PANCHKULA

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated by this Court

ARJESH KUMAR,PATIALA vs. ITO NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE , DELHI

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated by this Court

INCOME TAX OFFICER, FATEHABAD vs. MAHESH NAGPAL, FATEHABAD

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated by this Court

KAKA SINGH ALIAS GULJAR SINGH,PATIALA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , PATIALA

section 57.\nThe said provision reads thus:\n\"57. Deductions.-The income chargeable under the head 'Income from other\nsources' shall be computed after making the following deductions, namely :.\n(iv) in the case of income of the nature referred to in clause (viii) of sub-\nsection (2) of section 56, a deduction of a sum equal to fifty

AJMER SINGH,MOHALI vs. ITO, W-6(5), MOHAL

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Disposal Of Appeal.”

section 142(1) the assessee repeatedly said that the amount in the bank was the sale proceeds o f agriculture land o f her husband. Because the assessee's husband has no bank account and the amount is huge and not possible to carry to other place. Her husband deposited entire amount of sale o f agriculture land

AJMER SINGH,MOHALI vs. ITO, W-6(5), MOHAL

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Disposal Of Appeal.”

section 142(1) the assessee repeatedly said that the amount in the bank was the sale proceeds o f agriculture land o f her husband. Because the assessee's husband has no bank account and the amount is huge and not possible to carry to other place. Her husband deposited entire amount of sale o f agriculture land

ITO, W-6(5), MOHALI vs. SMT. GURDEV KAUR, KHARAR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Disposal Of Appeal.”

section 142(1) the assessee repeatedly said that the amount in the bank was the sale proceeds o f agriculture land o f her husband. Because the assessee's husband has no bank account and the amount is huge and not possible to carry to other place. Her husband deposited entire amount of sale o f agriculture land

SH. AJIT SINGH,PINJORE vs. ITO, WARD-1, PANCHKULA

92 /Chd/2024\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2014-15\nBaljeet Kaur\nबनाम\nThe ITO\n7736/4, Nadi Mohalla, Vill: Patti\nMehar, Ambala City-134003\nHaryana\nWard-1, Ambala\nस्थायी लेखा सं./ PAN NO: BOWPK2603A\nअपीलार्थी/Appellant\nप्रत्यर्थी/Respondent\nनिर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by :\nNone\nराजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by :\nShri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR\nआयकर अपील सं

NARENDER KAUR,KURUKSHETRA, HARYANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 , KURUKSHETRA

92 /Chd/2024\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2014-15\nBaljeet Kaur\n7736/4, Nadi Mohalla, Vill: Patti\nMehar, Ambala City-134003\nHaryana\nबनाम\nThe ITO\nWard-1, Ambala\nस्थायी लेखा सं./ PAN NO: BOWPK2603A\nअपीलार्थी/Appellant\nप्रत्यर्थी/Respondent\nनिर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by :\nNone\nराजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by :\nShri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR\nआयकर अपील सं

GURDEEP SINGH HUF,CHANDIGARH vs. ITO, WARD 5(5), CHANDIGARH

92 /Chd/2024\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2014-15\nBaljeet Kaur\nबनाम\nThe ITO\n7736/4, Nadi Mohalla, Vill: Patti\nWard-1, Ambala\nMehar, Ambala City-134003\nHaryana\nस्थायी लेखा सं./ PAN NO: BOWPK2603A\nअपीलार्थी/Appellant\nनिर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by :\nNone\nराजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by :\nShri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR\nआयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 172 /Chd/2024\nनिर्धारण

BALJIT SINGH,AMBALA CITY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, AMBALA, AMBALA

92 /Chd/2024\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2014-15\nBaljeet Kaur\nबनाम\nThe ITO\n7736/4, Nadi Mohalla, Vill: Patti\nWard-1, Ambala\nMehar, Ambala City-134003\nHaryana\nस्थायी लेखा सं./ PAN NO: BOWPK2603A\nअपीलार्थी/Appellant\nप्रत्यर्थी/Respondent\nनिर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by :\nNone\nराजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by :\nShri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR\nआयकर अपील सं

RANJEET SINGH KHUBBER,AMBALA vs. ITO, WARD 2, AMBALA

92 /Chd/2024\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2014-15\nBaljeet Kaur\n7736/4, Nadi Mohalla, Vill: Patti\nMehar, Ambala City-134003\nHaryana\nबनाम\nThe ITO\nWard-1, Ambala\nस्थायी लेखा सं./ PAN NO: BOWPK2603A\nअपीलार्थी/Appellant\nप्रत्यर्थी/Respondent\nनिर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by :\nNone\nराजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by :\nShri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR\nआयकर अपील सं

RAGHBIR SINGH HUF,CHANDIGARH vs. ITO-WARD-1(3), CHANDIGARH

92 /Chd/2024\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2014-15\nBaljeet Kaur\nबनाम\nThe ITO\n7736/4, Nadi Mohalla, Vill: Patti\nWard-1, Ambala\nMehar, Ambala City-134003\nHaryana\nस्थायी लेखा सं./ PAN NO: BOWPK2603A\nअपीलार्थी/Appellant\nनिर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by :\nNone\nराजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by :\nShri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR\nआयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 172 /Chd/2024\nनिर्धारण