BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “capital gains”+ Section 80P(2)(c)clear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore106Mumbai93Panaji67Karnataka55Raipur48Delhi48Hyderabad32Cochin25Chennai23Jaipur21Pune20Kolkata19Ahmedabad18Visakhapatnam17Surat15Lucknow13Nagpur8Indore8Chandigarh5Telangana5Cuttack4Kerala3Rajkot3SC3Amritsar3Varanasi3Calcutta2

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)(a)9Section 80P6Business Income4Deduction4House Property3Disallowance3Section 57o2Section 143(2)2Capital Gains2

THE TIARA CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL SERVICE SOCIETY LIMITED,KANGRA vs. ITO, DHARAMASHALA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly

ITA 905/CHANDI/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh01 May 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms.Diva Singh & Ms.Annapurna Gupta

For Appellant: Shri Gagan Singh Guleria, AdvFor Respondent: Smt.Chanderkanta, Addl.CIT
Section 80P(2)(a)

gains of business attributable to any one or more of such activities” 10. As is evident from a bare perusal of the above section, income earned by cooperative societies carrying on business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members is entitled to claim deduction under the said section, of income earned from carrying on the aforesaid business activities

THE PUNJAB STATE FEDERATION OF COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETIES LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the above appeals of the Assessee are dismissed

Long Term Capital Gains2
ITA 797/CHANDI/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Atul Goyal, C.A (Virtual Mode)For Respondent: Dr. Ranjit Kaur, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 57oSection 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

2)(a)(i). The assessee also disclosed long-term capital gain from sale of shops at Pakhowal, Ludhiana, and claimed indexed cost of acquisition. 4.1 The AO held that all income must first be classified under the proper heads before considering deductions. Based on judicial precedents, he treated interest from commercial banks as “income from other sources,” rejecting the assessee

THE PUNJAB STATE FEDERATION OF COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETIES LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the above appeals of the Assessee are dismissed

ITA 1308/CHANDI/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Jan 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: the appeal is finally heard.

For Appellant: Shri Atul Goyal, C.A (Virtual Mode)For Respondent: Dr. Ranjit Kaur, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 57oSection 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

2)(a)(i). The assessee also disclosed long-term capital gain from sale of shops at Pakhowal, Ludhiana, and claimed indexed cost of acquisition. 4.1 The AO held that all income must first be classified under the proper heads before considering deductions. Based on judicial precedents, he treated interest from commercial banks as “income from other sources,” rejecting the assessee

DCIT, CIRCLE, PATIALA vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD., PATIALA

In the result, ground no. 1 & 3 of the Revenue’s appeal is allowed and ground no

ITA 737/CHANDI/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Aug 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Saldi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT, DR
Section 143(2)

C, is subsequently transferred and there results income on such transfer. Going by the yardstick of the ld. AR, such gain should also be assessed under the head of business income because the circulating capital of the business was utilized for its purchase. Obviously it is not so as the resultant income on the transfer of building, being the capital

PUNJAB STATE COOP. BANK LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT, CL-2(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result the impugned order of Ld

ITA 293/CHANDI/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Atul Goyal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Dharam Vir, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 253Section 80P(2)(a)

80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, prior to the amendment in the said section and is a regular assessee with the Income Tax Department through the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 2(1) Chandigarh. 3. That the assessee society filed its return for the year under consideration on 30th September 2013 declaring therein