BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 43Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai74Chennai29Ahmedabad23Delhi22Hyderabad18Pune12Kolkata12SC9Bangalore8Surat6Amritsar5Cochin3Jaipur3Chandigarh2Rajkot2Visakhapatnam1Kerala1Panaji1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 402Section 1542Addition to Income2

PUNJAB STATE COOP. BANK LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT, CL-2(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result the impugned order of Ld

ITA 293/CHANDI/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Atul Goyal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Dharam Vir, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 253Section 80P(2)(a)

capital expenditure. b) Loss on sale of vehicles Rs.22,940/-. c) Rs.7,43,000/- on the basis of the audit report of the Chartered Account considering the same as being depicted in the Sundries Miscellaneous on account of OTS scheme. The addition made by the assessing officer is against the facts and the provisions of law. Hence the assessee filed

DCIT, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S AJAY SANGARI & CO., CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 860/CHANDI/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Nov 2018AY 2009-10
For Appellant: Shri. S.K. MukhiFor Respondent: Smt. Chandrakanta
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 234DSection 30Section 40Section 57

section 234D is Rs. 86,121/-." 5. Order u/s 154 was passed on 22.03.2013 disallowing excess salary paid to the partners of Rs. 8,70,974/-. A submission dated 10.09.2015 was filed during the course of appellate proceedings, which is considered. 6. It was submitted before the Ld. CIT(A) that the partners had withdrawn excess to their capital account