BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

194 results for “capital gains”+ Section 43(5)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,491Delhi1,837Bangalore879Chennai715Ahmedabad634Kolkata500Jaipur438Hyderabad235Chandigarh194Indore180Karnataka167Surat163Cochin156Pune149Visakhapatnam104Raipur86Rajkot79Cuttack78Agra71Nagpur70Guwahati58Calcutta55SC49Lucknow44Amritsar26Telangana26Panaji20Ranchi17Dehradun13Jodhpur11Allahabad11Kerala10Patna9Varanasi8Rajasthan6Jabalpur5A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Punjab & Haryana1Andhra Pradesh1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Addition to Income34Section 26330Section 40A(3)25Section 43C21Deduction17Section 13216Section 250(6)14Exemption12Section 143(3)11

SH. AMAR SINGH,JAGADHARI vs. ITO, YAMUNANAGAR

In the result, both the appeal of different assessees are allowed

ITA 365/CHANDI/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh26 Feb 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Rohit GoelFor Respondent: Smt. Chandrakanta

43,554/- on account of long term capital gain on sale of agricultural land and in denying the deduction under section 54B of the Act. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer noted that assessee had sold land for consideration of Rs. 1,92,01,875/- through Registered Sale Deed dated 20.03.2007. The sale consideration comprised

SH. JAI RAM,JAGADHARI vs. ITO, YAMUNANAGAR

In the result, both the appeal of different assessees are allowed

ITA 366/CHANDI/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh26 Feb 2018

Showing 1–20 of 194 · Page 1 of 10

...
Disallowance10
Section 2538
Section 143(2)8
AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Rohit GoelFor Respondent: Smt. Chandrakanta

43,554/- on account of long term capital gain on sale of agricultural land and in denying the deduction under section 54B of the Act. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer noted that assessee had sold land for consideration of Rs. 1,92,01,875/- through Registered Sale Deed dated 20.03.2007. The sale consideration comprised

SMT. AARTI SINGAL,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CC-1, CHANDIGARH

ITA 714/CHANDI/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 Sept 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri N.K. Saini, Vice- & Rajpal Yadav, Vice-

For Respondent: Shri G.C. Srinivastava, Spl.Counsel
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 132ASection 153ASection 153A(1)Section 250(6)

D. In the case of L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, ITA 5140/DEL/2011 (Special Bench, decision dated January 2013) the In the cases of Shri Sanjay Singhal and Others Vs. DCIT, Chandigarh (9 Appeals) 17 D.R. therein sought permission to file additional evidence being copies of orders passed by TPO in the assessee's own case

SH. SANJAY SINGAL,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CC-1, CHANDIGARH

ITA 710/CHANDI/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 Sept 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri N.K. Saini, Vice- & Rajpal Yadav, Vice-

For Respondent: Shri G.C. Srinivastava, Spl.Counsel
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 132ASection 153ASection 153A(1)Section 250(6)

D. In the case of L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, ITA 5140/DEL/2011 (Special Bench, decision dated January 2013) the In the cases of Shri Sanjay Singhal and Others Vs. DCIT, Chandigarh (9 Appeals) 17 D.R. therein sought permission to file additional evidence being copies of orders passed by TPO in the assessee's own case

SH. SANJAY SINGAL,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CC-1, CHANDIGARH

ITA 711/CHANDI/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 Sept 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri N.K. Saini, Vice- & Rajpal Yadav, Vice-

For Respondent: Shri G.C. Srinivastava, Spl.Counsel
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 132ASection 153ASection 153A(1)Section 250(6)

D. In the case of L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, ITA 5140/DEL/2011 (Special Bench, decision dated January 2013) the In the cases of Shri Sanjay Singhal and Others Vs. DCIT, Chandigarh (9 Appeals) 17 D.R. therein sought permission to file additional evidence being copies of orders passed by TPO in the assessee's own case

SH. SANJAY SINGAL HUF,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CC-1, CHANDIGARH

ITA 705/CHANDI/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 Sept 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri N.K. Saini, Vice- & Rajpal Yadav, Vice-

For Respondent: Shri G.C. Srinivastava, Spl.Counsel
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 132ASection 153ASection 153A(1)Section 250(6)

D. In the case of L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, ITA 5140/DEL/2011 (Special Bench, decision dated January 2013) the In the cases of Shri Sanjay Singhal and Others Vs. DCIT, Chandigarh (9 Appeals) 17 D.R. therein sought permission to file additional evidence being copies of orders passed by TPO in the assessee's own case

SMT. AARTI SINGAL,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CC-1, CHANDIGARH

ITA 717/CHANDI/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 Sept 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri N.K. Saini, Vice- & Rajpal Yadav, Vice-

For Respondent: Shri G.C. Srinivastava, Spl.Counsel
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 132ASection 153ASection 153A(1)Section 250(6)

D. In the case of L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, ITA 5140/DEL/2011 (Special Bench, decision dated January 2013) the In the cases of Shri Sanjay Singhal and Others Vs. DCIT, Chandigarh (9 Appeals) 17 D.R. therein sought permission to file additional evidence being copies of orders passed by TPO in the assessee's own case

SMT. AARTI SINGAL,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CC-1, CHANDIGARH

ITA 716/CHANDI/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 Sept 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri N.K. Saini, Vice- & Rajpal Yadav, Vice-

For Respondent: Shri G.C. Srinivastava, Spl.Counsel
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 132ASection 153ASection 153A(1)Section 250(6)

D. In the case of L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, ITA 5140/DEL/2011 (Special Bench, decision dated January 2013) the In the cases of Shri Sanjay Singhal and Others Vs. DCIT, Chandigarh (9 Appeals) 17 D.R. therein sought permission to file additional evidence being copies of orders passed by TPO in the assessee's own case

SH. ANIKET SINGAL,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CC-1, CHANDIGARH

ITA 718/CHANDI/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 Sept 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri N.K. Saini, Vice- & Rajpal Yadav, Vice-

For Respondent: Shri G.C. Srinivastava, Spl.Counsel
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 132ASection 153ASection 153A(1)Section 250(6)

D. In the case of L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, ITA 5140/DEL/2011 (Special Bench, decision dated January 2013) the In the cases of Shri Sanjay Singhal and Others Vs. DCIT, Chandigarh (9 Appeals) 17 D.R. therein sought permission to file additional evidence being copies of orders passed by TPO in the assessee's own case

SH. ANIKET SINGAL,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CC-1, CHANDIGARH

ITA 719/CHANDI/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 Sept 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri N.K. Saini, Vice- & Rajpal Yadav, Vice-

For Respondent: Shri G.C. Srinivastava, Spl.Counsel
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 132ASection 153ASection 153A(1)Section 250(6)

D. In the case of L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, ITA 5140/DEL/2011 (Special Bench, decision dated January 2013) the In the cases of Shri Sanjay Singhal and Others Vs. DCIT, Chandigarh (9 Appeals) 17 D.R. therein sought permission to file additional evidence being copies of orders passed by TPO in the assessee's own case

SH. SANJAY SINGAL,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CC-1, CHANDIGARH

ITA 708/CHANDI/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 Sept 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri N.K. Saini, Vice- & Rajpal Yadav, Vice-

For Respondent: Shri G.C. Srinivastava, Spl.Counsel
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 132ASection 153ASection 153A(1)Section 250(6)

D. In the case of L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, ITA 5140/DEL/2011 (Special Bench, decision dated January 2013) the In the cases of Shri Sanjay Singhal and Others Vs. DCIT, Chandigarh (9 Appeals) 17 D.R. therein sought permission to file additional evidence being copies of orders passed by TPO in the assessee's own case

SH. AMARDEEP SINGH ATHWAL,YAMUNANAGAR vs. ITO, WARD-1, YAMUNANAGAR

ITA 565/CHANDI/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Suraj Bhan Nain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

D, Chandigarh Ward 5(5) Chandigarh "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAGHG7637F अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Manpreet Singh, C.A राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 486 /Chd/ 2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Shri Hakam Singh बनाम The ITO H.No

INCOME TAX OFFICER, FATEHABAD vs. MAHESH NAGPAL, FATEHABAD

ITA 531/CHANDI/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Suraj Bhan Nain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

D, Chandigarh Ward 5(5) Chandigarh "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAGHG7637F अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Manpreet Singh, C.A राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 486 /Chd/ 2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Shri Hakam Singh बनाम The ITO H.No

PAWAN KUMAR,FATEHABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, FATEHABAD

ITA 1112/CHANDI/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Suraj Bhan Nain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

D, Chandigarh Ward 5(5) Chandigarh "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAGHG7637F अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Manpreet Singh, C.A राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 486 /Chd/ 2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Shri Hakam Singh बनाम The ITO H.No

SH. AMARDEEP SINGH ATHWAL,YAMUNANAGAR vs. ITO, WARD-1, YAMUNANAGAR

ITA 566/CHANDI/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Nov 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: BEFORE: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Suraj Bhan Nain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

D, Chandigarh Ward 5(5) Chandigarh "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAGHG7637F अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Manpreet Singh, C.A राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 486 /Chd/ 2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Shri Hakam Singh बनाम The ITO H.No

BALBIR KUMAR HUF,CHANDIGARH vs. ITO , CHANDIGARH

ITA 172/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Suraj Bhan Nain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

D, Chandigarh Ward 5(5) Chandigarh "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAGHG7637F अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Manpreet Singh, C.A राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 486 /Chd/ 2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Shri Hakam Singh बनाम The ITO H.No

RANJIT SINGH,PANCHKULA vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, CPC DEPARTMENT

ITA 992/CHANDI/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Nov 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Suraj Bhan Nain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

D, Chandigarh Ward 5(5) Chandigarh "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAGHG7637F अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Manpreet Singh, C.A राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 486 /Chd/ 2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Shri Hakam Singh बनाम The ITO H.No

SMT. SHANKRI DEVI,PANCHKULA vs. ACIT, PANCKULA CIRCLE, PANCHKULA

ITA 596/CHANDI/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Nov 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Suraj Bhan Nain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

D, Chandigarh Ward 5(5) Chandigarh "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAGHG7637F अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Manpreet Singh, C.A राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 486 /Chd/ 2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Shri Hakam Singh बनाम The ITO H.No

SAROJ CHAUDHARY BALA,PANCHKULA vs. ITO, WARD-4, PANCHKULA

ITA 635/CHANDI/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Suraj Bhan Nain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

D, Chandigarh Ward 5(5) Chandigarh "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAGHG7637F अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Manpreet Singh, C.A राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 486 /Chd/ 2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Shri Hakam Singh बनाम The ITO H.No

ARJESH KUMAR,PATIALA vs. ITO NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE , DELHI

ITA 876/CHANDI/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Nov 2025AY 2018-19
For Appellant: Shri Suraj Bhan Nain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

D, Chandigarh Ward 5(5) Chandigarh "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAGHG7637F अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Manpreet Singh, C.A राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 486 /Chd/ 2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Shri Hakam Singh बनाम The ITO H.No