Search: capital gains

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 271D(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur23 Hyderabad16 Delhi13 Visakhapatnam12 Chennai10 Surat10 Bangalore8 Ahmedabad6 Kolkata6 Mumbai5 Indore5 Pune4 Agra3 SC2 Nagpur2 Chandigarh2 Cuttack1 Rajkot1 Patna1 Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 269S11 Section 271D8 Penalty2

SOHAN LAL,KULLU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD KULLU, KULLU

The appeal stand allowed

ITA 1355/CHANDI/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh15 Apr 2026AY 2019-20

For Appellant: Sh. Parveen Sharma (Advocate) – Ld. AR (Virtual)For Respondent: Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl. CIT) – Ld. Sr. DR

Section 147Section 269SSection 271DSection 274

2. The impugned penalty stem from the fact that the assessee was assessed u/s 147 on 12-03-2024. It transpired that the assessee and his brother sold immoveable property for Rs.16 Lacs. The assessee’s share therein was Rs.8 Lacs. The Ld. AO accepted Long Term Capital Gains as offered by the assessee and accepted the returned income. However

SOHAN LAL,KULLU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD KULLU, KULLU

SURJIT KAUR ,PUNJAB vs. ITO WARD 3 , KHANNA, PUNJAB

SOHAN LAL,KULLU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD KULLU, KULLU

SURJIT KAUR ,PUNJAB vs. ITO WARD 3 , KHANNA, PUNJAB