ITO, SIRSA vs. SH. MAHABIR SINGH, SIRSA
In the result, we do not find any merit in this appeal of the Revenue
ITA 900/CHANDI/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh25 Sept 2025AY 2007-08
Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 900/Chd/2014 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2007-08 The Ito, Shri Mahabir Singh, Ward – 2, Vs S/O Shri Het Ram, Vpo Bani, Sirsa. Tehsil-Rania, Distt. Sirsa. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Cdvpm5319N अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessee By : Shri Vineet Krishan, Advocate Revenue By : Smt. Kusum Bansal, Cit Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing : 24.07.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 25.09.2025
For Appellant: Shri Vineet Krishan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT Sr.DR
Section 144Section 147Section 148
Capital Gain deserves to be assessed in the hands of the assessee. On the other hand, ld. counsel for the assessee
A.Y.2007-08
8
relied upon the order of ld.CIT (Appeals). He has pointed out to us Certificate of Tehsildar issued in response to the letter of ITO Ward-3, Sirsa, though this letter was also issued in the year