BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 144Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai61Bangalore19Mumbai18Kolkata11Pune10Lucknow9Nagpur9Jaipur9Raipur8Delhi7Chandigarh3Cuttack3Surat3Hyderabad2Indore1Ahmedabad1Amritsar1Cochin1Dehradun1Agra1Panaji1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 2637Section 143(3)5Section 1485Section 1514Section 1473Section 144A3Section 250(6)2Section 2502

AMARJIT SINGH,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 6(1) LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1171/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 1171 /Chd/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Shri Amarjit Singh बनाम The ITO C/o V V Bhalla & Company Ward 6(1) SCF-39, Rishi Nagar Main Market, Ludhiana Adjoining Subway, Ludhiana-141001, Punjab स्थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: ABTPS8558B अपीलार्थी/Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent निर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by : Shri Pankaj Bhalla, C.A राजस्व की ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT, Sr

For Appellant: Shri Pankaj Bhalla, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 144ASection 147Section 148Section 151Section 250Section 250(6)Section 270A

Capital Gain” and the initiation of penalty proceedings under sections 270A and 272A(1)(d). The Ld. AO had initiated reassessment proceedings under section 148 read with section 144A

SANDHYA GOEL H.NO.101217, HUDA, JAGADHRI,HARYANA vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PANCHKULA, HARYANA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 215/CHANDI/2024[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh14 May 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: ShriSudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR
Section 10(38)Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263

Capital Gain of Rs.48,54,326/- earned on sale of Lifeline Securities Ltd. is not genuine hence, it is an escaped income required to be assessed in the hands of the assessee. The AO accepted the stand of the assessee in the assessment order. The ld. Commissioner could find an error in the order of the AO which has caused

AVTAR SINGH,KHARAR vs. PCIT-1, CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal is dismissed

ITA 652/CHANDI/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Aug 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Shri Vineet Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT DR
Section 120Section 143(3)Section 144ASection 147Section 148Section 263

Capital Gain. The assessee also declared ‘other income’ at Rs.24,894/-. The AO, thereafter, issued a notice on 28.11.2018 u/s 143(3) and 142(1) of the Act. He passed the assessment order on 10.12.2018 and accepted the declared income. 4. The ld. counsel for the assessee, while impugning order of ld. ld. CIT u/s 263 took us through copy