MANPREET SINGH BHULLAR,PARWANOO vs. ITO, PARWANOO

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

bogus purchase by mentioning categorically that there is nothing to prove the entry pass evidences are baseless and sustained the addition at the GP rate arrived at by the assessee. Consequently, the addition of 2,52,917/- was sustained. As against the addition o f 3 1 , 790/- made by disallowing 20% of some of the expenses, the same

SH. AMAR SINGH,JAGADHARI vs. ITO, YAMUNANAGAR

In the result, both the appeal of different assessees are allowed