MANPREET SINGH BHULLAR,PARWANOO vs. ITO, PARWANOO
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 923/CHANDI/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh09 Jan 2020AY 2007-08
For Appellant: Shri Surinder Babbar, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Sudershan, JCIT
Section 143(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)
bogus purchase by mentioning categorically that there is nothing to prove the entry pass evidences are baseless and sustained the addition at the GP rate arrived at by the assessee. Consequently, the addition of 2,52,917/- was sustained. As against the addition o f 3 1 , 790/- made by disallowing 20% of some of the expenses, the same
