Search: bogus purchases

6 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 234Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi85 Mumbai81 Bangalore49 Jaipur25 Allahabad21 Agra15 Ahmedabad13 Hyderabad11 Indore10 Ranchi10 Chennai7 Chandigarh6 Raipur6 Kolkata5 Lucknow4 Jodhpur4 Rajkot4 Nagpur3 Surat3 Dehradun2 Guwahati1 Amritsar1 Pune1

Key Topics

Section 14813 Section 25011 Addition to Income6 Section 142(1)4 Section 1473 Section 234A3 Section 271(1)(c)3 Penalty3 Section 65A2 Section 115J

WARYAM STEEL CASTINGS PRIVATE LIMITED,LUDHIANA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4, LUDHIANA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed and the Cross appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 715/CHANDI/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh14 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: SHRI. RAJPAL YADAV (Vice President), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Kumar, C.A and Ms. Muskan Garg, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Ved Parkash Kalia, Sr. DR

Section 115JSection 148Section 250

purchase amount of Rs. 4,11,60,437/- as bogus, concluding that the assessee failed to establish the genuineness of these transactions. Consequently, the AO added Rs. 4,75,44,959/- (Rs. 63,84,522/- + Rs. 4,11,60,437/-) to the assessee’s total income, determining it at Rs. 4,73,64,687/- under normal provisions, while retaining

WARYAM STEEL CASTINGS PRIVATE LIMITED,LUDHIANA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4, LUDHIANA

WARYAM STEEL CASTINGS PRIVATE LIMITED,LUDHIANA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4, LUDHIANA

ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4, LUDHIANA, AAYAKAR BHAWAN vs. WARYAM STEEL CASTING PRIVATE LIMITED, KANGANWAL ROAD

POOJA KANSAL,CHANDIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, G.GARH, GOBINDGARH

POOJA KANSAL,CHANDIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, G.GARH, GOBINDGARH

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH vs. ATMA RAM JEWELLERS, CHANDIGARH

PAWAN GARG,PANCHKULA vs. ITO WARD 5((5) CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH