Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 80P(2)(A)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai148 Bangalore62 Raipur52 Pune35 Delhi27 Chennai24 Ahmedabad23 Kolkata21 Visakhapatnam19 Cochin14 Jaipur12 Surat10 Lucknow9 Nagpur9 Karnataka6 Jabalpur4 Jodhpur4 Panaji3 Chandigarh3 Indore2 Amritsar2 Rajkot1 Hyderabad1 Kerala1 Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)(e)18 Section 80P(2)(d)6 Section 10(34)3 Section 14A3 Deduction3 Disallowance3

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANCHKULA CIRCLE, PANCHKULA, PANCHKULA vs. HARYANA STATE COOPERATIVE SUPPLY AND MARKETING FEDERATION LTD, PANCHKULA

In the result, the present appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 664/CHANDI/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh16 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Aman Parti, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Geetinder Mann, CIT, DR

Section 10(34)Section 14ASection 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(e)

TDS reflected in Form 26AS. It was submitted that such income is eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(e). For the dividend

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANCHKULA CIRCLE, PANCHKULA, PANCHKULA vs. HARYANA STATE COOPERATIVE SUPPLY AND MARKETING FEDERATION LIMITED, PANCHKULA

In the result, the present appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 666/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh16 Jul 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Aman Parti, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Geetinder Mann, CIT, DR

Section 10(34)Section 14ASection 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(e)

TDS reflected in Form 26AS. It was submitted that such income is eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(e). For the dividend

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANCHKULA CIRCLE, PANCHKULA, PANCHKULA vs. HARYANA STATE COOPERATIVE SUPPLY AND MARKETING FEDERATION LTD, PANCHKULA

In the result, the present appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 665/CHANDI/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh16 Jul 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Aman Parti, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Geetinder Mann, CIT, DR

Section 10(34)Section 14ASection 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(e)

TDS reflected in Form 26AS. It was submitted that such income is eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(e). For the dividend