Search: TDS | BharatTax

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 6Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi55 Raipur39 Kolkata39 Mumbai31 Bangalore26 Jodhpur19 Pune13 Ahmedabad12 Jaipur10 Cochin10 Nagpur9 Lucknow8 Rajkot8 Amritsar6 Surat6 Chennai5 Chandigarh4 Varanasi3 Indore3 Hyderabad1 Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 271C12 Section 2068 Section 133A4 Section 206C4 Penalty4 TDS4 Addition to Income4 Survey u/s 133A4

THE ASSISTANT EXCISE & TAXATION COMMISSIONER ,NAHAN vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE, SHIMLA

In the result, all four appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 904/CHANDI/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh06 Dec 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Shri Vikram Singh Yadavआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.903 /Chd/2019 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2007-08 The Assistant Excise & बनाम The Additional Cit, Taxation Commissioner, Tds Range, Nahan Shimla "थायीलेखासं./Pan/Tan No: Ptla12468B अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Appellant: Sh.Harry Rikhy, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. AmanpreetKaur, Sr. DR

Section 133ASection 206Section 206CSection 271C

6A) for the impugned Financial Years has to fail, especially when the applicability of section 206C(1C) for the impugned years is not disputed. 16. Respectfully following the aforesaid ratio laid down by the Tribunal in the case of Asstt. Excise & Taxation Commissioner, Bilaspur&Una H.P. Vs. ITO (TDS

THE ASSISTANT EXCISE & TAXATION COMMISSIONER ,NAHAN vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE, SHIMLA

THE ASSISTANT EXCISE & TAXATION COMMISSIONER ,NAHAN vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE, SHIMLA

THE ASSISTANT EXCISE & TAXATION COMMISSIONER ,NAHAN vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE, SHIMLA

THE ASSISTANT EXCISE & TAXATION COMMISSIONER ,SHIMLA vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE, SHIMLA

THE ASSISTANT EXCISE & TAXATION COMMISSIONER ,SHIMLA vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE, SHIMLA