BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

170 results for “TDS”+ Section 69clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,392Mumbai1,268Bangalore808Chennai434Hyderabad342Kolkata337Ahmedabad292Indore199Jaipur199Chandigarh170Cochin163Pune144Raipur135Karnataka120Cuttack71Surat54Visakhapatnam53Rajkot47Nagpur40Lucknow39Ranchi38Amritsar30Agra27Jabalpur26Guwahati26Dehradun20Kerala17Jodhpur17Patna15Telangana11Allahabad10Varanasi8SC4Panaji3Calcutta2

Key Topics

Section 26342Section 143(3)35Addition to Income26Section 13(3)24Section 14823Section 143(2)18Section 142(1)15TDS15Section 4014Section 153A

BANUR BROTHER ,PATIALA vs. ITO-WARD-1, AMBALA

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed as and by way of remand to Ld

ITA 772/CHANDI/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Jun 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil Goyal, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 250Section 253Section 270ASection 69A

69,26,646/- chargeable to tax. Charge interest as per IT. Act. A copy of this order alongwith demand notice and penalty notices u/s 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for misreporting the income, and U/s 272A(1)(d) of the IT. Act for non compliance of notice sent to the assessee online electronically in E-proceedings facility through

Showing 1–20 of 170 · Page 1 of 9

...
13
Exemption11
Disallowance10

DCIT, C-1(1), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S STYLAM INDUSTRIES LTD., CHANDIGARH

In the result, the Department’s appeal in for assessment year

ITA 1033/CHANDI/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh04 Sept 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI A.D.JAIN (Vice President), SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vineet Krishan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dharam Vir, JCIT, Sr.DR
Section 14ASection 195Section 40Section 40ASection 5(2)Section 6Section 9(1)

TDS on the payment made. 11. The decision of the A.A.R. in the case of ‘S.K.F. Boilers & Driers P Ltd.’ (supra) is, as duly taken note of the ld. CIT(A), clearly distinguishable on facts. That decision, places reliance on the decision in the case of ‘Rajiv Malhotra’, rendered by the A.A.R., and reported at 284 ITR 564. In that

DCIT, C-1(1), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S STYLAM INDUSTRIES LTD., CHANDIGARH

In the result, the Department’s appeal in for assessment year

ITA 389/CHANDI/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh04 Sept 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI A.D.JAIN (Vice President), SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vineet Krishan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dharam Vir, JCIT, Sr.DR
Section 14ASection 195Section 40Section 40ASection 5(2)Section 6Section 9(1)

TDS on the payment made. 11. The decision of the A.A.R. in the case of ‘S.K.F. Boilers & Driers P Ltd.’ (supra) is, as duly taken note of the ld. CIT(A), clearly distinguishable on facts. That decision, places reliance on the decision in the case of ‘Rajiv Malhotra’, rendered by the A.A.R., and reported at 284 ITR 564. In that

M/S STYLAM INDUSTRIES LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, C-1(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the Department’s appeal in for assessment year

ITA 394/CHANDI/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh04 Sept 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI A.D.JAIN (Vice President), SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vineet Krishan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dharam Vir, JCIT, Sr.DR
Section 14ASection 195Section 40Section 40ASection 5(2)Section 6Section 9(1)

TDS on the payment made. 11. The decision of the A.A.R. in the case of ‘S.K.F. Boilers & Driers P Ltd.’ (supra) is, as duly taken note of the ld. CIT(A), clearly distinguishable on facts. That decision, places reliance on the decision in the case of ‘Rajiv Malhotra’, rendered by the A.A.R., and reported at 284 ITR 564. In that

M/S STYLAM INDUSTRIES LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, C-1(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the Department’s appeal in for assessment year

ITA 960/CHANDI/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh04 Sept 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI A.D.JAIN (Vice President), SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vineet Krishan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dharam Vir, JCIT, Sr.DR
Section 14ASection 195Section 40Section 40ASection 5(2)Section 6Section 9(1)

TDS on the payment made. 11. The decision of the A.A.R. in the case of ‘S.K.F. Boilers & Driers P Ltd.’ (supra) is, as duly taken note of the ld. CIT(A), clearly distinguishable on facts. That decision, places reliance on the decision in the case of ‘Rajiv Malhotra’, rendered by the A.A.R., and reported at 284 ITR 564. In that

DCIT, TDS, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE CIVIL SUPPLY CORPN. LTD., SIRHIND

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 320/CHANDI/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

ACIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAIN PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., BARNALA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 162/CHANDI/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

DCIT, TDS, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAINS PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., PATIALA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 319/CHANDI/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (F&A) (PERSONAL RESPONSIBLE),SHIMLA vs. ITO (TDS), SHIMLA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 1424/CHANDI/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

THE PUNJAB STATE COOPERATIVE SUPPLY,ROPAR vs. ACIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 669/CHANDI/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

DCIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAINS PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., FATEHGARH SAHIB

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 316/CHANDI/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

ITO (TDS-2), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAINS PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., MOHALI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 685/CHANDI/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S DISTRICT MANAGER PUNJAB,

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 1314/CHANDI/2016[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

ITO (TDS), PATIALA vs. THE DISTT. MANAGER, FATEHGARH SAHIB

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 1310/CHANDI/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

ITO (TDS-2), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAINS PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., MOHALI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 686/CHANDI/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S DISTRICT MANAGER PUNJAB, SANGRUR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 1312/CHANDI/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

ITO, CHANDIGARH vs. THE MANAGER DISTT. OFFICE,, MOHALI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 1241/CHANDI/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (F&A) (PERSONAL RESPONSIBLE),SHIMLA vs. ITO (TDS), SHIMLA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 1425/CHANDI/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

DCIT, TDS, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAINS PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., PATIALA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 318/CHANDI/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

ITO (TDS), PATIALA vs. THE DISTT. MANAGER, FATEHGARH SAHIB

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 1309/CHANDI/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment