BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

203 results for “TDS”+ Section 54clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,714Mumbai1,478Bangalore702Chennai468Kolkata342Hyderabad325Ahmedabad289Pune277Cochin217Chandigarh203Indore199Jaipur177Karnataka157Raipur147Visakhapatnam79Cuttack70Nagpur62Jabalpur54Lucknow51Surat44Rajkot43Dehradun34Ranchi33Agra25Jodhpur23Amritsar23Panaji15Guwahati15Allahabad14Patna13Telangana13SC7Kerala6Varanasi5Uttarakhand2Rajasthan1Calcutta1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 26324Addition to Income22Section 143(3)19Section 40A(3)15Section 153A13TDS12Disallowance12Deduction10Section 1329Section 153D

SUNITA RANI 40 MS TEJ RAM HARISH KUMAR ADD. MANDI SIRSA ,HARYANA vs. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX CPC BANGALURU JOA INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 SIRSA, HARYANA

ITA 546/DEL/2024[2022-2023]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh23 Dec 2024AY 2022-2023

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dharamvir, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 194Q

54,39,634/- 3. Credit of TDS claimed by the assessee in the return of income 1,62,441/- 4. TDS Credit as per Rule 37BA: 1/2*3 1,06,464/- 5. TDS Credit not allowed 55,977/- 4. It was submitted that the assessee is engaged in the business of commission agent of agriculture produce

AJAY KUMAR,FATEHABAD, HARYANA vs. ITO, WARD-1, FATEHABAD, FATEHABAD, HARYANA

ITA 463/CHANDI/2023[2018-19]Status: Disposed

Showing 1–20 of 203 · Page 1 of 11

...
9
Section 143(2)8
Section 1448
ITAT Chandigarh
11 Nov 2025
AY 2018-19
For Respondent: \nShri Suraj Bhan Nain, Advocate

TDS.\n10. Feeling aggrieved by the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A) the assessee is\nin appeal before us on the grounds mentioned hereinabove.\n11. The Id. AR, Shri Suraj Bhan Nain, Advocatethereafter, placing reliance\non the scheme of the Land Acquisition Act and the judicial position, invited\nour attention to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court

ACIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAIN PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., BARNALA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 162/CHANDI/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

DCIT, TDS, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAINS PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., PATIALA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 318/CHANDI/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

DCIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAINS PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., FATEHGARH SAHIB

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 317/CHANDI/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

ITO (TDS-2), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAINS PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., MOHALI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 686/CHANDI/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (F&A) (PERSONAL RESPONSIBLE),SHIMLA vs. ITO (TDS), SHIMLA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 1424/CHANDI/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

THE PUNJAB STATE COOPERATIVE SUPPLY,ROPAR vs. ACIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 669/CHANDI/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

ITO (TDS), PATIALA vs. THE DISTT. MANAGER, FATEHGARH SAHIB

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 1310/CHANDI/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

ITO (TDS), PATIALA vs. THE DISTT. MANAGER, FATEHGARH SAHIB

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 1309/CHANDI/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S DISTRICT MANAGER PUNJAB, SANGRUR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 1312/CHANDI/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

DCIT, TDS, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAINS PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., PATIALA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 319/CHANDI/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

ITO, CHANDIGARH vs. THE MANAGER DISTT. OFFICE,, MOHALI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 1241/CHANDI/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (F&A) (PERSONAL RESPONSIBLE),SHIMLA vs. ITO (TDS), SHIMLA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 1425/CHANDI/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

DCIT, TDS, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE CIVIL SUPPLY CORPN. LTD., SIRHIND

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 320/CHANDI/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

DCIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAINS PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., FATEHGARH SAHIB

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 316/CHANDI/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S DISTRICT MANAGER PUNJAB,

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 1314/CHANDI/2016[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S DISTRICT MANAGER PUNJAB, SANGRUR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 1313/CHANDI/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

ITO (TDS-2), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAINS PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., MOHALI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 685/CHANDI/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 195 of the Act. The Ld. DR, therefore, has submitted that the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ‘Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs CIT’ (supra) can safely be applied in the case of the present assessee before us. That the present assessee, apart from making the payment

JANTA LAND PROMOTERS PVT LTD,MOHALI vs. THE PRINICIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CHANDIGARH-1, CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 618/CHANDI/2025[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Oct 2025AY 2020-2021
For Appellant: Shri Pankaj Bhalla, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 194Section 263Section 68

TDS of Sh. Sukhbir Badal at the time of payment which is evident from his ledger account. Kind attention of your honour in invited towards the provisions of section 1941A which are reproduced as under:- ……………………….. 3). Issue No. 2.3 of para 2 of show cause notice: 2.3 It is also seen that there were advances for customers