BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 271Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai49Delhi44Bangalore41Karnataka21Indore15Jaipur10Chennai7Kolkata7Visakhapatnam6Panaji5Chandigarh5Pune4Hyderabad4Nagpur3Jodhpur1Agra1Lucknow1Ahmedabad1Raipur1SC1

Key Topics

Section 14818Section 271D15Section 275(1)(c)9Section 269S6Addition to Income5Section 133A3Section 1473Penalty3Survey u/s 133A3Natural Justice

SUNDEEP KAPILA,HIMACHAL PRADESH vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER CENTRAL, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1067/CHANDI/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh06 Aug 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Saurav Rohatgi, CA and Shri Rajat Mittal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Priyanka Dhar, Sr. DR
Section 133ASection 147Section 269SSection 271DSection 275(1)(c)

271D was made by the Assessing Officer only on 26.06.2023. Pursuant to this reference, the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (JCIT) issued the show cause notice on 16.08.2023, and ultimately passed the penalty order on 28.02.2024. 16. The learned AR submitted that for the purpose of computing limitation under section 275(1)(c), the relevant date is the date

3
Limitation/Time-bar3
Section 153C2

SUNDEEP KAPILA,HIMACHAL PRADESH vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER CENTRAL, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1068/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh06 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Saurav Rohatgi, CA and Shri Rajat Mittal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Priyanka Dhar, Sr. DR
Section 133ASection 147Section 269SSection 271DSection 275(1)(c)

271D was made by the Assessing Officer only on 26.06.2023. Pursuant to this reference, the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (JCIT) issued the show cause notice on 16.08.2023, and ultimately passed the penalty order on 28.02.2024. 16. The learned AR submitted that for the purpose of computing limitation under section 275(1)(c), the relevant date is the date

SUNDEEP KAPILA,HIMACHAL PRADESH vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER CENTRAL, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1069/CHANDI/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh06 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Saurav Rohatgi, CA and Shri Rajat Mittal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Priyanka Dhar, Sr. DR
Section 133ASection 147Section 269SSection 271DSection 275(1)(c)

271D was made by the Assessing Officer only on 26.06.2023. Pursuant to this reference, the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (JCIT) issued the show cause notice on 16.08.2023, and ultimately passed the penalty order on 28.02.2024. 16. The learned AR submitted that for the purpose of computing limitation under section 275(1)(c), the relevant date is the date

SUBHASH CHANDER GUPTA, H.NO. 1652 8 VISHNU COLONY, RAILWAY ROAD, KURUKSHETRA,HARYANA vs. ITO WARD-3, KURUKSHETRA, HARYANA

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are

ITA 765/CHANDI/2024[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Apr 2025AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate and Shri Abhinav Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT, DR
Section 143(2)Section 148Section 153C

TDS liability on behalf of trust and amount of Rs. 4,42,520/- is outstanding against his name as it was paid to him in advance. Further, there is also a reference to various entries such as: Entry standings in the Balance Sheet as white amount: 1) Abhinav Gupta 17250/- 2) Arun Gupta 226056/- 3) Rama Gupta 675322/- 4) Subash

SUBHASH CHANDER GUPTA, H.NO. 16528 VISHNU COLONY, RALIWAY ROAD, KURUKSHETRA,HARYANA vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KURUKSHETRA

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are

ITA 768/CHANDI/2024[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Apr 2025AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate and Shri Abhinav Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT, DR
Section 143(2)Section 148Section 153C

TDS liability on behalf of trust and amount of Rs. 4,42,520/- is outstanding against his name as it was paid to him in advance. Further, there is also a reference to various entries such as: Entry standings in the Balance Sheet as white amount: 1) Abhinav Gupta 17250/- 2) Arun Gupta 226056/- 3) Rama Gupta 675322/- 4) Subash