Search: TDS | BharatTax

9 results for “TDS”+ Section 26Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 4017 Section 14816 Section 143(3)12 Section 194C10 Addition to Income8 Disallowance7 Deduction6 TDS6 Section 1475 Section 194H

MUKESH MALHOTRA ,SHIMLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , SHIMLA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 822/CHANDI/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 Mar 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Mohan, Sr. Advocate with Shri Parveen Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ved Parkash Kalia, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 194CSection 194HSection 40

TDS, that taxes due have been paid by the deductee-assessee. However, this will not alter the liability to charge interest under section 201(1A) of the Act till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee-assessee or the liability for penalty under section 271C of the Income-tax Act." 8.1 Furthermore we may point out that

MUKESH MALHOTRA ,SHIMLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , SHIMLA

MUKESH MALHOTRA ,SHIMLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , SHIMLA

MUKESH MALHOTRA ,SHIMLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , SHIMLA

MUKESH MALHOTRA ,SHIMLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , SHIMLA

MUKESH MALHOTRA,SHIMLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , SHIMLA

MUKESH MALHOTRA ,SHIMLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SHIMLA, SHIMLA

M/S APEX BUILDERS, LUDHIANA vs. ITO, W-2(1), LUDHIANA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH vs. ESSIX BIOSCIENCES LIMITED, CHANDIGARH

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 6 (1), MOHALI vs. SKYCITY BUILDERS AND PROMOTERS PRIVATE LIMITED, KHRAR PUNJAB

SKYCITY BUILDERS AND PROMOTERS PRIVATE LIMITED, ,KHARAR, RUPNAGAR vs. DCIT WARD 6(1), CHANDIGARH JAO ITO 6(1) MOHALI, CHANDIGARH