Search: TDS | BharatTax

7 results for “TDS”+ Section 115Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi132 Mumbai93 Bangalore45 Dehradun28 Kolkata13 Chennai10 Pune10 Chandigarh7 Ahmedabad2 SC1 Jaipur1 Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 115J18 TDS7 Addition to Income7 Section 1954 Deduction4 Reopening of Assessment4 Double Taxation/DTAA4 Section 250(6)3 Section 2343 Section 234C

SH. MOHINDER SINGH SANGHERA vs. ASSTT. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH

The appeals are treated as allowed in the same terms and

ITA 369/CHANDI/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Sept 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

For Appellant: Sh Samir Mahajan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Chanderkanta, Sr. DR

Section 195

TDS @ 15% has already been deducted by Omaxe Limited in accordance with article 12 of the DTAA between India and U.K., income was offered to tax @ 15% accordingly. The Assessing officer, however, was of the view that the assured return received by the assessee from Omaxe Limited was not the interest income, rather he treated the same as return from

SH. JATINDER SINGH CHATTA vs. ASSTT. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH

The appeals are treated as allowed in the same terms and

SH. MOHINDER SINGH SANGHERA vs. ASSTT. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH

SH. JATINDER SINGH CHATTA vs. ASSTT. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH

SH. MOHINDER SINGH SANGHERA vs. ASSTT. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH

SH. JATINDER SINGH CHATTA vs. ASSTT. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH

SH. JATINDER SINGH CHATTA vs. ASSTT. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH

SH. MOHINDER SINGH SANGHERA vs. ASSTT. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH

DCIT, C-4, LUDHIANA vs. AARTI INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, LUDHIANA

DCIT, C-4, LUDHIANA vs. M/S AARTI STEELS LIMITED, LUDHIANA

DCIT, C-4, LUDHIANA vs. AARTI INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, LUDHIANA