64 results for “section 68”+ Section 73(1)clear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
Showing 1–20 of 64 · Page 1 of 4
Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA
68. This Court is however not inclined to accept, that the non-disclosure by the Arbitrator having represented M/s. SSSMIL in the High Court during the pendency of the arbitration, would amount to fraud. Admittedly to establish fraud, a very high degree of proof is necessary. The same is required to be preceded by sufficient particulars included in the application