Search: section 68 | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “section 68”+ Section 69Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,418 Delhi934 Jaipur342 Kolkata247 Chandigarh156 Bangalore146 Chennai143 Ahmedabad138 Indore115 Hyderabad111 Surat107 Pune97 Visakhapatnam60 Rajkot51 Raipur43 Lucknow37 Guwahati31 Nagpur28 Agra25 Cochin23 Jodhpur20 Amritsar19 Ranchi16 Jabalpur7 Dehradun6 Cuttack5 Calcutta5 Allahabad4 SC4 Karnataka4 Varanasi3 Patna3 Panaji1 Kerala1 Telangana1 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 6810 Section 10(38)7 Section 260A4 Section 69C4 Section 143(3)4 Addition to Income4 Section 133(6)3 Penny Stock3 Exemption3 Section 131

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 KOLKATA vs. TAPAN KANTI ROY

ITAT/224/2025HC Calcutta11 Mar 2026

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ,HON'BLE JUSTICE UDAY KUMAR

Section 131Section 68

Section 68 and 69C of the Act are - hereby directed to be deleted.” On perusal of the Tribunal’s order

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5,KOLKATA vs. AMIT KUMAR JAIN

ITAT/113/2022HC Calcutta26 Sept 2022

Bench: :

Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 68

2

Long Term Capital Gains2

Section 69C

68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and deleted the addition of Rs.1,19,295/- as commission paid outside the books of 3 account under Section 69C

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9 KOLKATA vs. NIKUNJ DHANUKA

Accordingly, the appeal fails and the same is dismissed

ITAT/104/2025HC Calcutta18 Jun 2025

Bench: :

Section 10(38)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 260ASection 68Section 69C

68 and Section 69C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 made by the Assessing 2 Officer by ignoring the larger

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 KOLKATA vs. PANCHDEEP CONSTRUCTION LTD

Accordingly, the appeal fails and is dismissed

ITAT/175/2023HC Calcutta28 Aug 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble The Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 28Th August, 2023 Appearance : Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, Adv. …For Appellant Mr. Avra Mazumdar, Adv. Mr. Samrat Das, Adv. Mr. Suman Bhowmick, Adv. ….For Respondent

Section 131Section 133(6)Section 260ASection 68Section 69C

68 of the Act and treated the same as unexplained expenditure under Section 69C of the Act and added

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 KOLKATA vs. RAGHVENDRA MOHTA

The appeal is dismissed and the substantial questions of

ITAT/51/2025HC Calcutta05 May 2025

Bench: : The Hon'Ble The Chief Justice T.S Sivagnanam -A N D- Hon'Ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das) Date : 5Th May, 2025.

Section 120Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 68Section 69C

Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 29.12.2016 purely on technical grounds and deleting the additions of Rs. 42,27,500/- made u/s. 68 and Rs.1,48,657/- made U/s. 69C