BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “section 68”+ Section 46Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi782Mumbai484Ahmedabad158Kolkata152Hyderabad132Chennai109Jaipur94Bangalore92Indore87Chandigarh59Pune57Surat57Raipur49Amritsar47Rajkot41Guwahati34Visakhapatnam32Allahabad25Cuttack25Lucknow24Nagpur19Agra16Patna10Dehradun8Ranchi8Jodhpur7Cochin6Jabalpur5Varanasi5Telangana3SC2Calcutta2Gauhati1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 683Section 142(1)2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOLKATA vs. M/S. AMBITION AGENCIES PRIVATE LIMITED

ITAT/143/2017HC Calcutta15 Nov 2021

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S.Sivagnanam A N D The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Dated : November 15, 2021. [Via Video Conference] Appearance : Mr. P.K. Bhowmick, Advocate …For The Appellant Mr. Pranit Bag, Advocate …For Respondent The Court :- This Appeal By The Revenue Filed Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act In Brevity) Is Directed Against The Order Dated 9Th November, 2016 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “C” Bench Kolkata (Tribunal) In I.T.A. No.713/Kol/2011 For The

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 250(4)Section 260ASection 271(1)(b)Section 68

68 of Income Tax Act, 1961 by disregarding that the assessee could not satisfactorily explain the genuineness of the transactions and creditworthiness of the share applicants in question ? (b) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Learned Tribunal, erred in law in holding that the manner in which the Learned CIT (Appeals) remanded the issue

FRONT LINE VYAPAR PRIVATE LIMITED vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOLKATA

The appeal stands dismissed

ITAT/144/2025HC Calcutta18 Sept 2025

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY

Section 131Section 143(3)Section 68

Section 68 of the said Act. On an appeal, the CIT(A) had called for a remand report on the substantial documents produced before the CIT(A) by the assessee from the assessing officer. 4. The tribunal found that though initially documents were submitted there was no cooperation before the assessing officer. The order for remand reference is dated