BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

65 results for “section 68”+ Section 43(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi4,344Mumbai3,069Bangalore1,175Chennai802Ahmedabad795Kolkata711Karnataka665Jaipur635Hyderabad591Chandigarh373Indore353Pune315Surat292Cochin252Raipur198Rajkot143Visakhapatnam138Agra110Cuttack106Lucknow103Nagpur101Telangana97Guwahati82Amritsar66Calcutta65Jabalpur64Ranchi62Allahabad60SC58Patna45Jodhpur38Dehradun26Varanasi19Rajasthan11Orissa9Kerala7Panaji4Uttarakhand3Andhra Pradesh2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Addition to Income5Section 260A4Section 143(2)3Section 142(1)3Section 1663Section 343Section 36(1)3Section 683Section 36(2)2Set Off of Losses

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 2 KOLKATA vs. M/S BST INFRATECH LTD

In the result the appeal is allowed, the order passed by the learned

ITAT/67/2024HC Calcutta23 Apr 2024

Bench: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 68

68 of the Act as undisclosed cash credit. The assessee was informed that penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) is being initiated separately. Aggrieved by such order, the assessee preferred appeal before the Commission of Income Tax (Appeal)- 11 Kolkata, [CIT(A)], contending that in the course of assessment proceeding the details/ documents in respect to the share

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 KOLKATA vs. PREMIER TIE UP PVT LTD

Showing 1–20 of 65 · Page 1 of 4

2
Survey u/s 133A2
ITAT/81/2022HC Calcutta26 Sept 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

For Respondent: Mr. Dhruba Ghosh, Adv
Section 34Section 36(1)Section 36(2)

43. On the argument under section 12 advanced by Mr. Kohli, Mr. Ghosh has submitted that section 12(5) and the Seventh schedule deal with cases of ineligibility at the time of appointment of the Arbitrator. The same cannot be applied to the facts of the instant case. It is only section 12(2) that would apply

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ASANSOL KOLKATA vs. RAJESH JHUNJHUNWALA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/26/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9, KOLKATA vs. PUSPA DEVI TIKMANI

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/150/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. POOJA JHUNJHUNWALA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/87/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PR CIT 9, KOLKATA vs. MANISHA TIKMANI

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/155/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9, KOLKATA vs. GITESH TIKMANI

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/154/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-12, KOLKATA vs. MUKTA AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/44/2020HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL -1, KOLKATA vs. SURAJ SAHANA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/41/2020HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. AAYUSH JHUNJHUNWALA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/88/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ASANSOL KOLKATA vs. RAKESH JHUNJHUNWALA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/27/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-SILIGURI vs. SHEKHAR AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/139/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA vs. KRISHNA KUMAR PARSURAMKA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/130/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SILIGURI vs. PRAKASHO DEVI SARIA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/138/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,BURDWAN vs. BIJAYA TAH

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/122/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-18, KOLKATA vs. SRI VIKASH GOEL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/85/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MUKESH SARAOGI (HUF)

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/76/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-15, KOLKATA vs. SMT. BABITA AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/64/2020HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. JEMISH SHAH

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/57/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SILIGURI vs. SRI SATYA NARAYAN SARIA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/168/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside