BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

63 results for “section 68”+ Section 41(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi4,055Mumbai3,346Bangalore1,201Chennai933Ahmedabad773Kolkata738Karnataka675Jaipur622Hyderabad596Pune404Indore362Surat356Chandigarh355Cochin233Raipur194Visakhapatnam164Agra121Rajkot120Cuttack112Nagpur109Lucknow102Telangana94Amritsar85Guwahati76Calcutta63Jabalpur61SC58Allahabad56Ranchi55Panaji51Patna31Jodhpur30Dehradun28Varanasi15Rajasthan12Orissa9Kerala6Uttarakhand3Tripura1Andhra Pradesh1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 804Section 1663Section 343Section 36(1)3Addition to Income3Section 260A2Section 14A2Section 115J2Section 94(7)2Deduction

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 KOLKATA vs. PREMIER TIE UP PVT LTD

ITAT/81/2022HC Calcutta26 Sept 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

For Respondent: Mr. Dhruba Ghosh, Adv
Section 34Section 36(1)Section 36(2)

41. It is next argued that the award debtors themselves are shareholders in M/s. SSSMIL and must be deemed to have known about the engagement of the Arbitrator as counsel in APD 252 of 2015. No application under Section 13 was made during the pendency of the 17 arbitration. The alleged discovery of the Arbitrator's engagement and appearance

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ASANSOL KOLKATA vs. RAJESH JHUNJHUNWALA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/26/2021

Showing 1–20 of 63 · Page 1 of 4

2
Long Term Capital Gains2
HC Calcutta
14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons from whom statements

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SILIGURI vs. PRAKASHO DEVI SARIA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/138/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons from whom statements

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SILIGURI vs. SRI SATYA NARAYAN SARIA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/168/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons from whom statements

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9, KOLKATA vs. PUSPA DEVI TIKMANI

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/150/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons from whom statements

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. JEMISH SHAH

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/57/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons from whom statements

PR CIT 9, KOLKATA vs. MANISHA TIKMANI

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/155/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons from whom statements

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-18, KOLKATA vs. SRI VIKASH GOEL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/85/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons from whom statements

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9, KOLKATA vs. GITESH TIKMANI

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/154/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons from whom statements

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL -1, KOLKATA vs. SURAJ SAHANA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/41/2020HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons from whom statements

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. AAYUSH JHUNJHUNWALA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/88/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons from whom statements

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ASANSOL KOLKATA vs. RAKESH JHUNJHUNWALA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/27/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons from whom statements

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-SILIGURI vs. SHEKHAR AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/139/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons from whom statements

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA vs. KRISHNA KUMAR PARSURAMKA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/130/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons from whom statements

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. POOJA JHUNJHUNWALA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/87/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons from whom statements

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,BURDWAN vs. BIJAYA TAH

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/122/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons from whom statements

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-12, KOLKATA vs. MUKTA AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/44/2020HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons from whom statements

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MUKESH SARAOGI (HUF)

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/76/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons from whom statements

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-15, KOLKATA vs. SMT. BABITA AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/64/2020HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons from whom statements

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. SHRI MAHENDRA KUMAR PERIWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/136/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons from whom statements