BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “section 68”+ Section 302clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka466Mumbai374Delhi313Jaipur138Chennai89Bangalore85Ahmedabad85Chandigarh80Kolkata69Hyderabad44Rajkot42Surat42Indore35Pune32Nagpur17Cochin10Raipur9Dehradun9Telangana7Ranchi7SC7Lucknow6Jodhpur6Visakhapatnam5Amritsar4Calcutta4Jabalpur2Allahabad2Guwahati2Cuttack2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Patna1Andhra Pradesh1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 684Section 14A3Section 260A2Section 2(22)(e)2Addition to Income2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 1 KOLKATA vs. M/S DULICHAND CHAMPALAL TEXTILE

Accordingly, the appeal fails and dismissed

ITAT/253/2022HC Calcutta09 Jan 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 9Th January, 2023 Appearance : Mr. Prithu Dhudheria, Adv. …For Appellant. Mr. S.M. Surana, Adv., Adv. ..For Respondent

Section 2(22)(e)Section 260ASection 68

302/- made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961? 2 ii) WHETHER on the facts and in the circumstances

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2, KOLKATA vs. M/S. R.M.COMMERCIAL PVT LTD

The appeal is dismissed

ITAT/158/2021HC Calcutta
09 Feb 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 9Th February, 2022 Appearance :- Mr. Debasish Chowdhury, Adv. … For Appellant Mr. J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Ms. Swapna Das, Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Das, Adv. … For Respondent

Section 14ASection 260ASection 68

Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act, for brevity) is directed against the order dated 6th December, 2019, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, `A’ Bench, Kolkata in ITA Nos. 305 and 306/Kol/2018 for the assessment years 2012-13 and 2013-14. Revenue has raised the following substantial questions of law for both the assessment

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. SUMAN KUMAR

ITAT/128/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: :

68,781 till March 5, 2019. The purported retraction of the employee in his letter dated June 25, 2018, according to the appellant, contains ex-facie false statements since the employee had amassed substantial assets out of the ill-gotten funds received in lieu of such excessive rebates and had admitted to having received kickbacks from the dealers representing

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. SAJJADBHAI NURUDDIN NANDARBARWAL

ITAT/129/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: :

68,781 till March 5, 2019. The purported retraction of the employee in his letter dated June 25, 2018, according to the appellant, contains ex-facie false statements since the employee had amassed substantial assets out of the ill-gotten funds received in lieu of such excessive rebates and had admitted to having received kickbacks from the dealers representing