BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

101 results for “section 68”+ Section 10(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi9,126Mumbai7,968Bangalore2,345Kolkata2,281Ahmedabad1,812Chennai1,778Jaipur1,398Hyderabad1,262Pune1,156Surat818Chandigarh814Karnataka774Indore725Cochin511Raipur436Rajkot403Visakhapatnam352Amritsar242Nagpur233Lucknow216Cuttack213Agra204Guwahati194Telangana151Ranchi131Jodhpur129SC110Jabalpur107Calcutta101Allahabad99Patna92Panaji92Dehradun75Varanasi36Rajasthan18Kerala13Orissa11Punjab & Haryana5A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN4Uttarakhand3Gauhati3ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Tripura1Andhra Pradesh1HARJIT SINGH BEDI CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1

Key Topics

Section 6851Section 26335Section 260A32Addition to Income30Section 143(3)29Section 14712Section 10(38)12Section 13111Section 80H10Long Term Capital Gains

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9,KOLKATA vs. MANJU OSATWAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and

ITAT/96/2021HC Calcutta11 Feb 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

For Appellant: Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Swapna Das, Adv
Section 10(38)Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 180Section 182Section 260ASection 263

Showing 1–20 of 101 · Page 1 of 6

10
Condonation of Delay9
Penny Stock8

68 of the Income Tax Act or not? 6. We have heard Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, learned standing Counsel for the appellant and Ms. Swapna Das and Mr. Siddharth Das, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent/assessee. 7. As an interesting question of law arises for consideration in this appeal, we requested Mr. J.P. Khaitan, learned senior counsel to assist

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 2 KOLKATA vs. M/S BST INFRATECH LTD

In the result the appeal is allowed, the order passed by the learned

ITAT/67/2024HC Calcutta23 Apr 2024

Bench: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 68

68 of the Act as undisclosed cash credit. The assessee was informed that penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) is being initiated separately. Aggrieved by such order, the assessee preferred appeal before the Commission of Income Tax (Appeal)- 11 Kolkata, [CIT(A)], contending that in the course of assessment proceeding the details/ documents in respect to the share

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 KOLKATA vs. MINTO PARK ESTATES PVT LTD

In the result, the appeal is allowed and the order passed by the learned

ITAT/4/2025HC Calcutta01 Aug 2025

Bench: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS)

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 68

1,10,00,000/- made by the Assessing Officer under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on account

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ASANSOL KOLKATA vs. RAJESH JHUNJHUNWALA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/26/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9, KOLKATA vs. GITESH TIKMANI

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/154/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. JEMISH SHAH

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/57/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. POOJA JHUNJHUNWALA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/87/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PR CIT 9, KOLKATA vs. MANISHA TIKMANI

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/155/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-18, KOLKATA vs. SRI VIKASH GOEL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/85/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-15, KOLKATA vs. SMT. BABITA AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/64/2020HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL -1, KOLKATA vs. SURAJ SAHANA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/41/2020HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. AAYUSH JHUNJHUNWALA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/88/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ASANSOL KOLKATA vs. RAKESH JHUNJHUNWALA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/27/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9, KOLKATA vs. PUSPA DEVI TIKMANI

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/150/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SILIGURI vs. PRAKASHO DEVI SARIA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/138/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA vs. KRISHNA KUMAR PARSURAMKA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/130/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,BURDWAN vs. BIJAYA TAH

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/122/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-12, KOLKATA vs. MUKTA AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/44/2020HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MUKESH SARAOGI (HUF)

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/76/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-SILIGURI vs. SHEKHAR AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/139/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

1,00,000/- for purchase of 10,000 shares in SRK Industries was able to sell those shares after 14 months for a total consideration of Rs. 75,61,372/- ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 39 of 150 thereby earning total LTCG of Rs. 74,68,959/-. Therefore, it is submitted that the Tribunal brushed aside