BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Unexplained Cash Creditclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,018Delhi848Ahmedabad294Kolkata274Chennai268Jaipur238Bangalore203Rajkot100Pune99Chandigarh93Surat86Hyderabad67Indore58Nagpur50Amritsar48Raipur42Cochin40Guwahati38Lucknow37Agra25Patna23Visakhapatnam19Jodhpur18Allahabad14Cuttack9Dehradun4Varanasi4Panaji2Calcutta2Orissa2SC1Gauhati1Telangana1Karnataka1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 2636Section 1515Section 683Section 1473Section 1482Section 143(3)2Unexplained Cash Credit2Reassessment2Reopening of Assessment

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 KOLKATA vs. M/S ROYAL TOUCH FABLON PRIVATE LIMITED

The appeal is dismissed

ITAT/132/2025HC Calcutta03 Dec 2025

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ,HON'BLE JUSTICE UDAY KUMAR

Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 68

cash credit U/s. 68 of the I.T. Act without considering the fact that income escaping assessment in reasons recorded has also been considered as unexplained and taken due cognizance of ? d) WHETHER in facts and in the circumstances of the case the Ld. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was not justified in law by not following the judicial principles laid down

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 KOLKATA vs. M/S DANIEL COMMODITIES PRIVATE LIMITED

The appeal is dismissed

2
Addition to Income2
ITAT/155/2025HC Calcutta14 Jan 2026

Bench: : The Hon'Ble Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj & The Hon’Ble Justice Uday Kumar Date : 14Th January, 2026

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 151Section 263Section 68

unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Act? IV. Whether the Learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has committed substantial error in law in not taking the cognizance of the judicial principles laid down in the matter of Vedanta Ltd vs CIT reported in [2021] 124 taxmann.com 435(Bombay) wherein the Hon'ble High court discussed regarding the invocation