BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 263clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai589Delhi561Bangalore268Kolkata222Chennai179Ahmedabad124Jaipur113Chandigarh69Pune64Hyderabad62Raipur55Indore45Rajkot43Nagpur34Lucknow27Cochin26Jodhpur26Allahabad22Cuttack21Guwahati20Surat16Karnataka13Agra12Amritsar12Patna11Visakhapatnam10Dehradun7Calcutta5Telangana4Kerala3Panaji3SC3Ranchi2Himachal Pradesh2Jabalpur2Uttarakhand1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 26320Section 1478Section 143(3)5Section 1515Section 684Addition to Income4Section 260A3Reassessment3Reopening of Assessment

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 2 KOLKATA vs. PEARL TRACOM PVT LTD

ITAT/240/2024HC Calcutta01 Jul 2025

Bench: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS)

For Appellant: Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Pratyush Jhunjhunwalla, Advocate
Section 131Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 154Section 260ASection 263

reassessment proceedings u/s. 147 pending proceedings u/s. 154?” We have heard Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, learned senior standing counsel for the appellant/department and Mr. Pratyush Jhunjhunwalla, learned counsel for the respondent/assessee. The assessee preferred appeal before the learned Tribunal against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Kolkata-21 [CIT(A)] dated 20.3.2023 by which

3
Section 1312
Revision u/s 2632
Bogus Purchases2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 KOLKATA vs. M/S DANIEL COMMODITIES PRIVATE LIMITED

The appeal is dismissed

ITAT/155/2025HC Calcutta14 Jan 2026

Bench: : The Hon'Ble Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj & The Hon’Ble Justice Uday Kumar Date : 14Th January, 2026

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 151Section 263Section 68

reassessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 147 of the Act was without jurisdiction and, therefore, the same was non-est. He has submitted that the subsequent revision order passed by the ld. PCIT u/s 263 of the Act and the consequent order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) r.w.s sec. 263 of the Act were, therefore

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9 KOLKATA vs. BINOD KUMAR TEKRIWAL

In the result, the appeals filed by the revenue are allowed and the

ITAT/32/2022HC Calcutta15 Jul 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak Date : 15Th July, 2022. Appearance :- Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv. ….For Appellant

Section 260ASection 263Section 69C

147 of the Act, on 30/03/2015 on the basis of incriminating information received by the AO. In the said assessment order it was established that expenditure worth Rs.54,14,476/-, claimed by you as purchase, was bogus. When expenditure is established as bogus, there is no provision in the act, whereby partial disallowance to the bogus expenditure

JNJ FINANCE COMPANY PVT LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-I

Appeal stands dismissed

ITAT/219/2015HC Calcutta11 May 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 11Th May, 2022. Appearance : Ms. Swapna Das, Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Das, Adv. …For Appellant Ms. Smita Das De, Adv. …For Respondent The Court : This Appeal By The Assessee Filed Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act For Brevity) Is Directed Against The Order Dated August 10, 2015, Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench, Kolkata In I.T.A. No. 888/Kol/2014 For The Assessment Year 2008- 09. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Consideration :- I) Whether On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Learned Tribunal Is Correct In Law & On Facts In Holding That The Order Dated 27.12.2010 Passed In Pursuance Of The Proceedings U/S 147 On Specific Issue & Wherein The Subject Matter Of The Share

Section 147Section 260ASection 263Section 68

147 on specific issue and wherein the subject matter of the share 2 capital was not involved can be revised u/s 263 and as such the order u/s 263 is barred by limitation? ii) Whether the Learned Tribunal was justified in holding that the first proviso to section 68, which has been inserted by the Finance Act, 2012 with effect

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9 KOLKATA vs. MRS PREMLATA TEKRIWAL

In the result, the appeals filed by the revenue are

ITAT/29/2022HC Calcutta22 Nov 2022

Bench: This Court In Itat/27/2022, Itat/32/2022 And

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263

147 of the Act, on 30/03/2015 on the basis of incriminating information received by the AO. In the said assessment order it was established that expenditure worth 4 Rs.54,14,476/-, claimed by you as purchase, was bogus. When expenditure is established as bogus, there is no provision in the act, whereby partial disallowance to the bogus expenditure