BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “reassessment”+ Section 70clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,477Delhi1,367Chennai509Jaipur409Bangalore396Ahmedabad290Kolkata234Hyderabad233Chandigarh199Surat132Raipur129Pune123Indore106Amritsar82Rajkot80Cochin80Cuttack77Visakhapatnam62Patna50Telangana46Lucknow44Nagpur44Guwahati35Allahabad34Ranchi30Jodhpur28Karnataka25Dehradun19Agra15SC9Orissa7Calcutta6Rajasthan3Varanasi2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 26311Section 143(3)5Section 260A2Section 1472Addition to Income2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOLKATA vs. ARSHIA GLOBAL TRADECOM PRIVATE LIMITED

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is allowed

ITAT/175/2021HC Calcutta13 Sept 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 260ASection 68

70,81,602/-, the assessing officer held the transactions to be not genuine as the assessee failed to produce the parties related to those transactions and the summons issued to them were also not complied with. Further the assessing officer pointed out that in the scrutiny assessment made under Section 143(3) dated 27.03.2014,the assessing officer held that

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 KOLKATA vs. M/S K M KHADIM AND CO

ITAT/148/2023HC Calcutta17 Jul 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble The Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 17Th July, 2023 Appearance : Ms. Smita Das De, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. …For Appellant The Court : This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act) Is Directed Against The Order Dated 21.12.2022 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Kolkata (The Tribunal) In Ita/278/Kol/2022 For The Assessment Year 2014-15. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Consideration : 1. Whether On The Facts Of The Case & In Law, The Learned Tribunal Was Justified In Quashing The Order Under Section 263 Of The Said Act Ignoring The Fact That The Assessing Officer In His Order Under Section 143[3] Read With Section 263 Dated 23.12.2019 Concluded That Rs.3,63,122/- Should Be Added As

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 263

70,850/- and raising the total demand of Rs.5,47,192/-. Thereafter, once again the PCIT exercised power under Section 263 of the Act and issued show-cause notice dated 21.02.2022. In the notice after setting out the reasons assigned by the Assessing Officer while completing the assessment vide order dated 23.12.2019 the PCIT would state that on further scrutiny

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-17, KOLKATA vs. M/S. RADHASHYAM TIRTHABASI PAUL

ITA/106/2018HC Calcutta17 Jan 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

70. Pijush Kanti Chowdhury (supra) has held that, passing of an interim order staying the operation of a judgement, does not mean that, the existence of the judgement is wiped out. 71. Applying the principles of Shree Chamundi Mopeds Ltd (supra) and Pijush Kanti Chowdhury (supra) in the facts of the present case, the interim order passed by the appeal

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -2, KOLKATA vs. M/S. AGR AUTOMOBILES PVT LTD

ITAT/128/2018HC Calcutta13 Dec 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

70. Pijush Kanti Chowdhury (supra) has held that, passing of an interim order staying the operation of a judgement, does not mean that, the existence of the judgement is wiped out. 71. Applying the principles of Shree Chamundi Mopeds Ltd (supra) and Pijush Kanti Chowdhury (supra) in the facts of the present case, the interim order passed by the appeal

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOLKATA vs. LAST PEAK DATA PRIVATE LIMITED

ITAT/106/2018HC Calcutta26 Mar 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

70. Pijush Kanti Chowdhury (supra) has held that, passing of an interim order staying the operation of a judgement, does not mean that, the existence of the judgement is wiped out. 71. Applying the principles of Shree Chamundi Mopeds Ltd (supra) and Pijush Kanti Chowdhury (supra) in the facts of the present case, the interim order passed by the appeal

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOLKATA vs. PARAMOUNT PROPERTIES & ESTATE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED

ITAT/108/2018HC Calcutta05 Feb 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

70. Pijush Kanti Chowdhury (supra) has held that, passing of an interim order staying the operation of a judgement, does not mean that, the existence of the judgement is wiped out. 71. Applying the principles of Shree Chamundi Mopeds Ltd (supra) and Pijush Kanti Chowdhury (supra) in the facts of the present case, the interim order passed by the appeal