BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 67clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,438Mumbai1,097Bangalore413Chennai405Ahmedabad215Hyderabad214Jaipur210Kolkata189Chandigarh131Raipur82Pune73Rajkot48Indore47Lucknow37Allahabad33Surat32Patna31Nagpur31Agra30Amritsar23Visakhapatnam23Jodhpur21Guwahati19Cuttack17Cochin16Dehradun15Telangana10SC10Ranchi8Karnataka7Orissa5Calcutta4Rajasthan4Kerala3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2J&K1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)4Section 153A4Section 1433Section 132(4)2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION & TRA vs. JOY PARTNERSHIP MINING CENTRE

ITAT/71/2018HC Calcutta15 Nov 2021

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani

Section 142Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 260A

67,595/- but the assessing officer has not 10 considered it at all for computation of tax under Section 115JB of the Act, 1961. In other words, there is absolutely no whisper in the assessment order with regard to the tax liability of the respondent assessee under Section 115JB of the Act, 1961 on the admitted facts of the case

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (IT & TP) vs. M/S. DONGFANG ELECTRIC CORPORATION

ITAT/66/2018HC Calcutta
09 Jul 2021

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 133ASection 139Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

67,97,340/- under section 271(1)(c) of the Act read with Explanation 5A for the assessment year 2006-07 and Rs.3,63,20,279/- for the assessment year 2007-08. 8. The reasons recorded by the assessing officer in the penalty order for the assessment year 2006-07, is reproduced below :- “The above submission has been carefully considered

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-17, KOLKATA vs. M/S. RADHASHYAM TIRTHABASI PAUL

ITA/106/2018HC Calcutta17 Jan 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

67. The Division Bench while passing the interim order on July 31, 2012 obviously considered the Entry Tax Act, 2012 to be valid as the validity of the Entry Tax Act, 2012 was in issue in the appeals. It did not pronounce the Entry Tax Act, 2012 to be invalid at any point of time prior to the date

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -2, KOLKATA vs. M/S. AGR AUTOMOBILES PVT LTD

ITAT/128/2018HC Calcutta13 Dec 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

67. The Division Bench while passing the interim order on July 31, 2012 obviously considered the Entry Tax Act, 2012 to be valid as the validity of the Entry Tax Act, 2012 was in issue in the appeals. It did not pronounce the Entry Tax Act, 2012 to be invalid at any point of time prior to the date