BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “reassessment”+ Section 65(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,541Mumbai1,149Bangalore466Chennai388Jaipur341Ahmedabad265Hyderabad217Kolkata166Chandigarh163Pune135Indore89Raipur85Amritsar67Cochin63Visakhapatnam59Surat57Nagpur56Guwahati49Lucknow46Rajkot46Telangana44Ranchi38Patna36Karnataka33Cuttack31Jodhpur27Dehradun27Allahabad22Agra20SC9Orissa7Jabalpur5Calcutta5Rajasthan4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Kerala1Uttarakhand1Varanasi1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 1473

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) , KOLKATA vs. B.P.PODDAR FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and the

ITAT/143/2021HC Calcutta13 Sept 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 11(5)Section 13(1)(b)Section 13(1)(c)Section 13(1)(d)Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148

65,97,000/- with M/s. Nissan Developers and Properties Pvt. Ltd. and Poddar Projects Ltd. respectively and both these companies are specified persons of the assessee. Therefore, the Assessing Officer held that these amounts are to be taxed separately at Maximum Marginal Rate in terms of the proviso to Section 164(2) of the Act. Further, the Assessing Officer pointed

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-17, KOLKATA vs. M/S. RADHASHYAM TIRTHABASI PAUL

ITA/106/2018HC Calcutta17 Jan 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

65. Having answered the first issue we take up the second issue to the fifth issues together as they are interconnected as also for the sake of convenience. 66. The interim order dated July 31, 2012 passed by the Division Bench is still continuing. The appeals are yet to be disposed of. In fact, the appeals would be disposed

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -2, KOLKATA vs. M/S. AGR AUTOMOBILES PVT LTD

ITAT/128/2018HC Calcutta13 Dec 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

65. Having answered the first issue we take up the second issue to the fifth issues together as they are interconnected as also for the sake of convenience. 66. The interim order dated July 31, 2012 passed by the Division Bench is still continuing. The appeals are yet to be disposed of. In fact, the appeals would be disposed

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOLKATA vs. LAST PEAK DATA PRIVATE LIMITED

ITAT/106/2018HC Calcutta26 Mar 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

65. Having answered the first issue we take up the second issue to the fifth issues together as they are interconnected as also for the sake of convenience. 66. The interim order dated July 31, 2012 passed by the Division Bench is still continuing. The appeals are yet to be disposed of. In fact, the appeals would be disposed

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOLKATA vs. PARAMOUNT PROPERTIES & ESTATE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED

ITAT/108/2018HC Calcutta05 Feb 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

65. Having answered the first issue we take up the second issue to the fifth issues together as they are interconnected as also for the sake of convenience. 66. The interim order dated July 31, 2012 passed by the Division Bench is still continuing. The appeals are yet to be disposed of. In fact, the appeals would be disposed