BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “reassessment”+ Section 63clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,361Mumbai1,163Bangalore497Chennai393Jaipur363Kolkata280Ahmedabad266Hyderabad188Chandigarh150Pune114Indore114Raipur93Cochin79Visakhapatnam68Surat62Nagpur45Telangana45Lucknow41Rajkot40Cuttack40Ranchi38Allahabad34Karnataka32Patna30Amritsar28Agra28Jodhpur24Dehradun23Guwahati14SC9Calcutta6Orissa5Panaji2Rajasthan2Uttarakhand1Varanasi1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Section 26311Section 271(1)(c)4Section 153A4Section 143(3)3Section 132(4)2Addition to Income2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (IT & TP) vs. M/S. DONGFANG ELECTRIC CORPORATION

ITAT/66/2018HC Calcutta09 Jul 2021

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 133ASection 139Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

63,560/-. Likewise, for the assessment year 2007-08, the assessee filed original return of income under Section 139 of the Act, 1961 on 31.10.2007 disclosing total income of Rs.127,24,13,150/-. After the search and seizure operations on 23.11.2006 and pursuant to the notice dated 26.02.2009 under Section 153A of the Act, 1961, the respondent/assessee filed return

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 KOLKATA vs. M/S K M KHADIM AND CO

ITAT/148/2023HC Calcutta17 Jul 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble The Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 17Th July, 2023 Appearance : Ms. Smita Das De, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. …For Appellant The Court : This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act) Is Directed Against The Order Dated 21.12.2022 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Kolkata (The Tribunal) In Ita/278/Kol/2022 For The Assessment Year 2014-15. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Consideration : 1. Whether On The Facts Of The Case & In Law, The Learned Tribunal Was Justified In Quashing The Order Under Section 263 Of The Said Act Ignoring The Fact That The Assessing Officer In His Order Under Section 143[3] Read With Section 263 Dated 23.12.2019 Concluded That Rs.3,63,122/- Should Be Added As

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 263

63,122/-, which has resulted in under exemption of income of Rs.27,000/-. This was the reason for once again exercising power under Section 263 of the Act. The assessee submitted the reply to the show-cause notice and raised the question of limitation stating that in terms of sub Section (2) of Section 263 the power could not have

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-17, KOLKATA vs. M/S. RADHASHYAM TIRTHABASI PAUL

ITA/106/2018HC Calcutta17 Jan 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

63. In view of the discussions above, respectfully, we answer the first issue by setting aside the impugned judgement and order dated June 24, 2013 passed by the learned Single Judge. 64. While delivering the impugned judgement and order dated June 24, 2013, learned Single Judge had granted stay of the same for a period of 6 weeks. Within

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -2, KOLKATA vs. M/S. AGR AUTOMOBILES PVT LTD

ITAT/128/2018HC Calcutta13 Dec 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

63. In view of the discussions above, respectfully, we answer the first issue by setting aside the impugned judgement and order dated June 24, 2013 passed by the learned Single Judge. 64. While delivering the impugned judgement and order dated June 24, 2013, learned Single Judge had granted stay of the same for a period of 6 weeks. Within

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOLKATA vs. LAST PEAK DATA PRIVATE LIMITED

ITAT/106/2018HC Calcutta26 Mar 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

63. In view of the discussions above, respectfully, we answer the first issue by setting aside the impugned judgement and order dated June 24, 2013 passed by the learned Single Judge. 64. While delivering the impugned judgement and order dated June 24, 2013, learned Single Judge had granted stay of the same for a period of 6 weeks. Within

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOLKATA vs. PARAMOUNT PROPERTIES & ESTATE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED

ITAT/108/2018HC Calcutta05 Feb 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

63. In view of the discussions above, respectfully, we answer the first issue by setting aside the impugned judgement and order dated June 24, 2013 passed by the learned Single Judge. 64. While delivering the impugned judgement and order dated June 24, 2013, learned Single Judge had granted stay of the same for a period of 6 weeks. Within