BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment”+ Section 271(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi905Mumbai873Jaipur305Kolkata241Bangalore229Ahmedabad225Chennai176Pune143Rajkot85Hyderabad82Indore71Surat69Raipur63Chandigarh61Amritsar40Cuttack37Nagpur36Guwahati34Cochin33Ranchi32Lucknow30Agra29Visakhapatnam25Patna24Dehradun23Allahabad23SC11Panaji11Karnataka8Jodhpur8Jabalpur5Telangana5Calcutta2Varanasi2Rajasthan1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)4Section 153A4Section 1473Section 132(4)2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (IT & TP) vs. M/S. DONGFANG ELECTRIC CORPORATION

ITAT/66/2018HC Calcutta09 Jul 2021

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 133ASection 139Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

b) and (c) of Section 271(1) have been satisfied would be reached only after the assessee has been heard or has been given a reasonable opportunity of being heard.” 26. In Mak Data Private Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax – II (2014) 1 SCC 674 [paragraphs 9 to 13], Hon'ble Supreme Court considered the provisions of Section 271

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9 KOLKATA vs. P L GOENKA HUF

Accordingly, the appeal filed by the revenue is allowed and the substantial

ITAT/241/2024HC Calcutta06 May 2025

Bench: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS)

For Appellant: Mr. Tilak Mitra, AdvocateFor Respondent: None
Section 144BSection 147Section 260A

b) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) was justified in law by not considering the fact that assessee had indulged in manipulation of the share prices of penny stock M/s. Tuni Textiles Mils Ltd with an intention to record fictitious long Term Capital Gains