BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “reassessment”+ Section 153A(1)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,367Mumbai1,497Chennai567Bangalore564Jaipur451Hyderabad375Chandigarh178Ahmedabad177Kolkata173Pune142Visakhapatnam142Amritsar137Indore107Cochin93Nagpur81Raipur75Guwahati73Patna70Rajkot65Agra53Cuttack50Karnataka41Ranchi41Dehradun36Lucknow34Allahabad32Surat31Jodhpur25Telangana11SC9Kerala6Jabalpur6Calcutta5Rajasthan3Orissa3Gauhati3Punjab & Haryana2Uttarakhand1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 153A10Section 143(3)5Addition to Income5Section 1324Section 132A4Section 271(1)(c)4Section 260A3Reassessment3Section 682Section 132(4)

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (IT & TP) vs. M/S. DONGFANG ELECTRIC CORPORATION

ITAT/66/2018HC Calcutta09 Jul 2021

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 133ASection 139Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

153A only in pursuant to search for the A.Y. 2007-08. The submission of the assessee was considered and found to have no merit in the light of the provisions of the Explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) inserted by the Finance Act 2007. The provisions are very clear that if any undisclosed income is found or declared after

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9,KOLKATA vs. MANJU OSATWAL

2
Block Assessment2
Limitation/Time-bar2

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and

ITAT/96/2021HC Calcutta11 Feb 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

For Appellant: Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Swapna Das, Adv
Section 10(38)Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 180Section 182Section 260ASection 263

reassess the income of the assessee for the relevant assessment year. Aggrieved by the order passed by the PCIT the assessee filed appeal before the Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the assessee has already offered long term capital gain of Rs.74,24,380/- to tax under the IDS and paid the taxes thereon and this fact was brought

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1,KOLKATA vs. M/S PHALGUNI ENCLAVE PVT LTD

The appeal stands disposed of in

ITAT/281/2022HC Calcutta08 May 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Acting Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 8Th May, 2023 Appearance : Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. ...For Appellant Mr. S. Kejriwal, Adv. Mr. N. Mittal, Adv. …For Respondent The Court :- It Appears That There Is A Delay Of Twenty Days In Filing This Appeal. We Have Perused The Affidavit Filed In Support Of The Delay Condone Petition & We Find That Sufficient Cause Has Been Shown For Not Preferring The Appeal Within The Period Of Limitation. Hence, The Delay In Filing The Appeal Is Condoned. The Petition For Condonation Of Delay Is Allowed. This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Revenue Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act (The Act) Is Directed Against The Order Dated 16.06.2022 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “A” Bench Kolkata (The Tribunal) In It(Ss) A No. 24/Kol/2021 & Co 05/Kol/2022 Relating To Assessment Year 2011-12.

Section 132Section 132ASection 153Section 153ASection 2(22)Section 2(22)(e)Section 260A

1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE ITAT/281/2022 IA NO. GA/1/2022, GA/2/2022 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOLKATA -VERSUS- M/s. PHALGUNI ENCLAVE PVT. LTD. BEFORE : THE HON’BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 8th May, 2023 Appearance : Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. ...for appellant

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 KOLKATA vs. RAHUL PREMIER INDIA AGENCY PRIVATE LIMITED

Accordingly, the appeal fails and the same is dismissed

ITAT/133/2025HC Calcutta05 Aug 2025

Bench: : The Hon'Ble The Chief Justice T.S Sivagnanam -A N D- Hon'Ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das) Date : 5Th August, 2025. Appearance : Mr. Aryak Datt, Adv. Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, Adv. …For Appellant.

Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 147Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

1. Whether in facts and in the circumstances of the case the Ld.Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was not justified in law in quashing the reassessment order without considering the fact that the reopening was made on the basis of specific and credible information from the investigation wing of the department ? 2. Whether in facts and in the circumstances

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 2 KOLKATA vs. AMICUS REAL ESTATE PVT LTD

ITAT/106/2025HC Calcutta18 Sept 2025

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY

Section 132Section 132ASection 153A

1. This appeal is filed against the order dated 14th June, 2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Kolkata in I.T.A. No. 803/Kol/2023 relating to the assessment year 2010-11. 2. The appellant is aggrieved by the order passed by the CIT(A) reversing the order of the Assessing Officer. The dispute relates to the assessment year