BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 144Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai444Delhi404Ahmedabad219Chennai200Hyderabad163Pune127Kolkata97Jaipur84Raipur79Chandigarh77Visakhapatnam73Rajkot69Bangalore67Indore53Agra37Lucknow25Patna23Surat22Nagpur18Dehradun16Guwahati14Amritsar12Ranchi11Cochin9Jodhpur7Cuttack7Calcutta3Orissa2Panaji2Allahabad2SC2Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 148A4Section 1474Section 144B3Reassessment3Reopening of Assessment3Section 1482Section 143(3)2Section 260A2Addition to Income2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9 KOLKATA vs. P L GOENKA HUF

Accordingly, the appeal filed by the revenue is allowed and the substantial

ITAT/241/2024HC Calcutta06 May 2025

Bench: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS)

For Appellant: Mr. Tilak Mitra, AdvocateFor Respondent: None
Section 144BSection 147Section 260A

reassessment contemplated under Section 147 of the Act would include “borrowed information” and the same ought not to be mistaken with “borrowed satisfaction” as there exists a striking distinction between the two concepts. Hence, conclusion arrived at by 3 the Assessing Officer based upon his own satisfaction drawn from the information received from the investigation wing cannot be said

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 KOLKATA vs. RAHUL PREMIER INDIA AGENCY PRIVATE LIMITED

Accordingly, the appeal fails and the same is dismissed

ITAT/133/2025HC Calcutta05 Aug 2025

Bench: : The Hon'Ble The Chief Justice T.S Sivagnanam -A N D- Hon'Ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das) Date : 5Th August, 2025. Appearance : Mr. Aryak Datt, Adv. Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, Adv. …For Appellant.

Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 147Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

reassessment order without considering the fact that the reopening was made on the basis of specific and credible information from the investigation wing of the department ? 2. Whether in facts and in the circumstances of the case the Ld.Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was not justified in law in deleting the addition of 2 Rs.40,00,000/- on account of unexplained

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 MUMBAI vs. M/S VODAFONE IDEA LTD

In the result, the appeal (APO/2/2023) is allowed and

ITAT/2/2023HC Calcutta01 Feb 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Acting Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 5Th April, 2023 Appearance : Mr. Pranit Bag Adv. Mr. Anujit Mookherji, Adv. ...For The Appellant Ms. Smita Das De, Adv. ...For The Respondent. The Court : This Intra-Court Appeal By The Writ Petitioner Is Directed Against The Order Dated 28Th November, 2022 In Wpo/2571/2022. The Appellant Had Filed The Writ Petition Challenging An Order Passed Under Section 148A(D) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The ‘Act’) & The Consequential Notice Issued Under Section 148 Of The Act. The Learned Single Bench Dismissed The Writ Petition On The Ground That The Order Has Not Been Passed By An

Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 148Section 148A

144B of the Act was completed by an order dated 27th April, 2021. Against the said odder, the assessee had preferred appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) wherein they have contended that the Assessing Officer erred in making addition of Rs.10,78,18,938/- on account of purchase made by the assessee without considering the detailed documents