BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment”+ Section 144(1)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,180Mumbai1,029Chennai372Jaipur356Ahmedabad352Bangalore309Hyderabad251Kolkata237Pune188Raipur148Surat125Amritsar121Chandigarh120Rajkot111Indore109Visakhapatnam98Patna84Agra69Cuttack62Cochin55Lucknow52Nagpur49Guwahati47Allahabad30Jodhpur30Dehradun26Telangana25Panaji20Karnataka17SC16Ranchi14Jabalpur9Varanasi8Orissa3Rajasthan2Calcutta2Uttarakhand1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Section 1477Section 2634Section 260A2Section 143(3)2Section 1312Reassessment2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 2 KOLKATA vs. PEARL TRACOM PVT LTD

ITAT/240/2024HC Calcutta01 Jul 2025

Bench: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS)

For Appellant: Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Pratyush Jhunjhunwalla, Advocate
Section 131Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 154Section 260ASection 263

1) of the Act and specifically denied the alleged transaction with Sandeep Roy or his firm, M/s. Sarika Trading Company and submitted that such allegation was not supported by any document or evidence. While so, an assessment order was passed under section 263 read with section 144 of the Act on 6.12.2019 adding the entire share capital again

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 KOLKATA vs. PHILIPS INDIA LTD

Accordingly, the appeal fails and is dismissed

ITAT/285/2024HC Calcutta13 Aug 2025

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Chief Justice T.S Sivagnanam

Section 144Section 147Section 260A

1 to Section 147 of the Act which mandates “production before the assessing officer of account book or other evidence from which material evidence could with due diligence have been discovered by the assessing officer will not necessarily amount to disclosure within the meaning of the foregoing proiso?” We have heard Mr. Smarajit Roy Chowdhury, learned senior standing counsel