BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 132(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,533Mumbai2,108Bangalore721Chennai585Jaipur493Hyderabad424Ahmedabad315Kolkata279Chandigarh199Pune183Surat151Amritsar148Visakhapatnam137Indore126Cochin111Rajkot99Nagpur88Raipur88Patna82Guwahati71Agra64Lucknow47Karnataka44Telangana41Cuttack41Allahabad32Dehradun30Jodhpur30Ranchi22SC19Panaji15Orissa6Kerala6Rajasthan4Jabalpur4Gauhati3Calcutta3Punjab & Haryana2Varanasi1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 153A9Section 1324Section 132A4Section 271(1)(c)4Addition to Income3Section 132(4)2Reassessment2Block Assessment2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (IT & TP) vs. M/S. DONGFANG ELECTRIC CORPORATION

ITAT/66/2018HC Calcutta09 Jul 2021

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 133ASection 139Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

reassessment shall be deemed to constitute satisfaction of the Assessing Officer for initiation of the penalty proceedings under the said clause (c). 274. Procedure.- (1) No order imposing a penalty under this Chapter shall be made unless the assessee has been heard, or has been given a reasonable opportunity of being heard. (2) No order imposing a penalty under this

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 2 KOLKATA vs. AMICUS REAL ESTATE PVT LTD

ITAT/106/2025HC Calcutta18 Sept 2025

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY

Section 132Section 132ASection 153A

1. This appeal is filed against the order dated 14th June, 2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Kolkata in I.T.A. No. 803/Kol/2023 relating to the assessment year 2010-11. 2. The appellant is aggrieved by the order passed by the CIT(A) reversing the order of the Assessing Officer. The dispute relates to the assessment year

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1,KOLKATA vs. M/S PHALGUNI ENCLAVE PVT LTD

The appeal stands disposed of in

ITAT/281/2022HC Calcutta08 May 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Acting Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 8Th May, 2023 Appearance : Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. ...For Appellant Mr. S. Kejriwal, Adv. Mr. N. Mittal, Adv. …For Respondent The Court :- It Appears That There Is A Delay Of Twenty Days In Filing This Appeal. We Have Perused The Affidavit Filed In Support Of The Delay Condone Petition & We Find That Sufficient Cause Has Been Shown For Not Preferring The Appeal Within The Period Of Limitation. Hence, The Delay In Filing The Appeal Is Condoned. The Petition For Condonation Of Delay Is Allowed. This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Revenue Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act (The Act) Is Directed Against The Order Dated 16.06.2022 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “A” Bench Kolkata (The Tribunal) In It(Ss) A No. 24/Kol/2021 & Co 05/Kol/2022 Relating To Assessment Year 2011-12.

Section 132Section 132ASection 153Section 153ASection 2(22)Section 2(22)(e)Section 260A

1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE ITAT/281/2022 IA NO. GA/1/2022, GA/2/2022 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOLKATA -VERSUS- M/s. PHALGUNI ENCLAVE PVT. LTD. BEFORE : THE HON’BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 8th May, 2023 Appearance : Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. ...for appellant