BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 119(2)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi555Mumbai467Chennai151Bangalore137Jaipur116Kolkata111Chandigarh99Hyderabad84Ahmedabad70Raipur63Indore61Pune57Nagpur38Guwahati36Telangana30Patna28Ranchi24Allahabad23Cuttack21Surat20Lucknow20Rajkot19Cochin18Amritsar10Karnataka8SC8Agra6Visakhapatnam6Orissa5Jodhpur4Dehradun4Jabalpur3Calcutta3Rajasthan2

Key Topics

Section 80H10Section 260A3Section 1473Section 80I3Reassessment3Section 682Section 133(6)2Deduction2Reopening of Assessment2

AI CHAMPDANY INDUSTRIES LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER, INCOME TAX, CENTRAL - II KOLKATA , WEST BENGAL

In the result, we find that the order of the

ITA/32/2005HC Calcutta16 Sept 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam

Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 80H

2 the various orders passed by Assessing Officer increasing or reducing the relief under Section 80HHC of the Act? ii) Whether the purported assessment proceedings initiated by the Tribunal for the said assessment year 1994-95 is without jurisdiction and illegal since none of the conditions precedent for assumption of the jurisdiction existed and/or were satisfied? We have heard

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 KOLKATA vs. M/S NARAYAN TRADECOM PVT LTD

Accordingly, the appeal fails and is dismissed

ITAT/76/2025
HC Calcutta
10 Jun 2025

Bench: :

Section 131Section 133(6)Section 260ASection 68

2 b) Whether in facts and in the circumstances of the case the Ld. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was not justified in law in quashing the reassessment order without considering the established legal principles as laid down by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the matter of Rakesh Gupta vs. CIT, (2018) 405 ITR 213/303 ? c) Whether in facts

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -4, KOLKATA vs. GRAPHITE INDIA LTD

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITAT/207/2016HC Calcutta02 Aug 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : August 02, 2022. Appearance : Mr. Aryak Dutta, Adv ….For Appellant Mr. Somak Basu, Adv. …For Respondent The Court : This Appeal By The Revenue Filed Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act) Is Directed Against The Order Dated 8Th January, 2016 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench, Kolkata (Tribunal) In I.T.A. No. 398/Kol/2008 & I.T.A. No. 537/Kol/2008 For The Assessment Year 2000-2001 Respectively. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Consideration :- I) Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case The Learned Tribunal Was Justified In Law In Quashing The Order Passed Under Section 147 Of The Said Act Despite The Fact That There Was Failure On The Part Of The Assessee To Disclose Material Facts In The

Section 142(1)Section 147Section 260ASection 80I

2 return of the income that SEB price used as indicator of realizable value of Power included an element of tax duty which is really did not have to pay? ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in law in quashing the Order passed under Section 147 holding inter-alia that