BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 119clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi565Mumbai494Chennai144Bangalore134Jaipur118Chandigarh107Kolkata106Hyderabad88Ahmedabad80Raipur63Indore63Pune61Guwahati37Nagpur32Telangana30Cochin29Patna27Ranchi26Allahabad23Surat23Lucknow21Cuttack18Rajkot18Amritsar10Karnataka10SC8Agra8Visakhapatnam6Orissa5Jodhpur4Dehradun4Jabalpur3Calcutta3Rajasthan2Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 80H10Section 260A3Section 1473Section 80I3Reassessment3Section 682Section 133(6)2Deduction2Reopening of Assessment2

AI CHAMPDANY INDUSTRIES LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER, INCOME TAX, CENTRAL - II KOLKATA , WEST BENGAL

In the result, we find that the order of the

ITA/32/2005HC Calcutta16 Sept 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam

Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 80H

Section 80HHC of the Act by order dated 11.6.1999 stood set aside and the same attained finality upon dismissal of the appeal filed by the revenue before the learned tribunal vide order dated 20.8.2002. As against the reassessment order dated 30.3.2001, the assessee filed appeal before the CIT(A) which was allowed by order dated 20.11.2002 primarily on the ground

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -4, KOLKATA vs. GRAPHITE INDIA LTD

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITAT/207/2016
HC Calcutta
02 Aug 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : August 02, 2022. Appearance : Mr. Aryak Dutta, Adv ….For Appellant Mr. Somak Basu, Adv. …For Respondent The Court : This Appeal By The Revenue Filed Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act) Is Directed Against The Order Dated 8Th January, 2016 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench, Kolkata (Tribunal) In I.T.A. No. 398/Kol/2008 & I.T.A. No. 537/Kol/2008 For The Assessment Year 2000-2001 Respectively. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Consideration :- I) Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case The Learned Tribunal Was Justified In Law In Quashing The Order Passed Under Section 147 Of The Said Act Despite The Fact That There Was Failure On The Part Of The Assessee To Disclose Material Facts In The

Section 142(1)Section 147Section 260ASection 80I

reassessment has to be based on fulfillment of certain pre-conditions and if the concept of change of opinion is removed then in the garb of reopening the assessment review takes place. Apart from that we note that the very same issue namely the direction claimed in 80IA in the assessee’s own case for the 4 assessment year

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 KOLKATA vs. M/S NARAYAN TRADECOM PVT LTD

Accordingly, the appeal fails and is dismissed

ITAT/76/2025HC Calcutta10 Jun 2025

Bench: :

Section 131Section 133(6)Section 260ASection 68

reassessment order without considering the established legal principles as laid down by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the matter of Rakesh Gupta vs. CIT, (2018) 405 ITR 213/303 ? c) Whether in facts and in the circumstances of the case the Ld. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was not justified in law in deleting the addition of Rs.22,00,119